Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24135495›Full record

ReviewAutophagy2013

Mitophagy in hematopoietic stem cells: the case for exploration.

Aashish Joshi, Mondira Kundu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autophagy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hematopoietic stem cell metabolism within the bone marrow niche - insights and opportunities.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. An Overview of Autophagy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Autophagy and Metabolism in Normal and Malignant Hematopoiesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Extinguishing the Embers: Targeting AML Metabolism.Trends in molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aashish JoshiDepartment of Pathology; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis, TN USA.
Mondira Kundu

Funding

Regulation of autophagy by AMPK, Hsp90-Cdc37 and Ulk1 in erythroid cellsR01HL114697 · NHLBI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KUNDU, MONDIRA · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL114697NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are inherently quiescent and self-renewing, yet can differentiate and commit to multiple blood cell types. Intracellular mitochondrial content is dynamic, and there is an increase in mitochondrial content during differentiation and lineage commitment in HSCs. HSCs reside in a hypoxic niche within the bone marrow and rely heavily on glycolysis, while differentiated and committed progenitors rely on oxidative phosphorylation. Increased oxidative phosphorylation during differentiation and commitment is not only due to increased mitochondrial content but also due to changes in mitochondrial cytosolic distribution and efficiency. These changes in the intracellular mitochondrial landscape contribute signals toward regulating differentiation and commitment. Thus, a functional relationship exists between the mitochondria in HSCs and the state of the HSCs (i.e., stemness vs. differentiated). This review focuses on how autophagy-mediated mitochondrial clearance (i.e., mitophagy) may affect HSC mitochondrial content, thereby influencing the fate of HSCs and maintenance of hematopoietic homeostasis.

Indexed as

MitophagyAnimalsAutophagyHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic SystemHumansMitochondriaModels, Biologicalautophagycommitmentdifferentiationhematopoiesishematopoietic progenitor cellshematopoietic stem cellsmitochondriamitophagyquiescenceself-renewal

Identifiers

PMID24135495
PMCPMC4028333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.