Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24135375›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2014

Valproic acid for the treatment of hemorrhagic shock: a dose-optimization study.

John O Hwabejire, Jennifer Lu, Baoling Liu, Yongqing Li, Ihab Halaweish, Hasan B Alam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Modern resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock: what is on the horizon?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John O HwabejireDivision of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer Lu
Baoling Liu
Yongqing Li
Ihab Halaweish
Hasan B Alam
Harvard University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Modulation of Acetylation in the Treatment of Lethal InjuriesR01GM084127 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALAM, HASAN B · 2009 to 2019
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundValproic acid (VPA) has been shown to improve survival in animal models of hemorrhagic shock at a dose of 300 mg/kg. Our aim was to identify the ideal dose through dose-escalation, split-dosing, and dose de-escalation regimens. MATERIALS AND

methodsRats were subjected to sublethal 40% hemorrhage and treated with vehicle or VPA (dose of 300, 400, or 450 mg/kg) after 30 min of shock. Acetylated histones and activated proteins from the PI3K-Akt-GSK-3β survival pathway at different time points were quantified by Western blot analysis. In a similar model, a VPA dose of 200 mg/kg followed 2 h later by another dose of 100 mg/kg was administered. Finally, animals were subjected to a lethal 50% hemorrhage and VPA was administered in a dose de-escalation manner (starting at dose of 300 mg/kg) until a significant drop in percent survival was observed.

resultsLarger doses of VPA resulted in greater acetylation of histone 3 and increased activation of PI3K pathway proteins. Dose-dependent differences were significant in histone acetylation but not in the activation of the survival pathway proteins. Split-dose administration of VPA resulted in similar results to a single full dose. Survival was as follows: 87.5% with 300 and 250 mg/kg of VPA, 50% with 200 mg/kg of VPA, and 14% with vehicle-treated animals.

conclusionsAlthough higher doses of VPA result in greater histone acetylation and activation of prosurvival protein signaling, doses as low as 250 mg/kg of VPA confer the same survival advantage in lethal hemorrhagic shock. Also, VPA can be given in a split-dose fashion without a reduction in its cytoprotective effectiveness.

Indexed as

AcetylationAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaHistonesMalePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyShock, HemorrhagicValproic AcidGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 betaGsk3b protein, ratHistonesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktValproic AcidDose optimizationHemorrhagic shockHistone deacetylase inhibitorsValproic acid

Identifiers

PMID24135375
PMCPMC3972223
OpenAlexW2108003465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.