Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24134832›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2013

The Coriell personalized medicine collaborative pharmacogenomics appraisal, evidence scoring and interpretation system.

Neda Gharani, Margaret A Keller, Catharine B Stack, Laura M Hodges, Tara J Schmidlen, Daniel E Lynch, Erynn S Gordon, Michael F Christman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Big Data Analytics for Genomic Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Challenges in Translating GWAS Results to Clinical Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Neda GharaniThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Margaret A KellerThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA ; Current Address: American Red Cross, 700 Spring Garden Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123, USA.
Catharine B StackThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA ; Current Address: Annals of Internal Medicine, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.
Laura M HodgesThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Tara J SchmidlenThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Daniel E LynchThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Erynn S GordonThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Michael F ChristmanThe Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) in clinical care can lead to improved drug efficacy and reduced adverse drug reactions. However, there has been a lag in adoption of PGx tests in clinical practice. This is due in part to a paucity of rigorous systems for translating published clinical and scientific data into standardized diagnostic tests with clear therapeutic recommendations. Here we describe the Pharmacogenomics Appraisal, Evidence Scoring and Interpretation System (PhAESIS), developed as part of the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative research study, and its application to seven commonly prescribed drugs.

Identifiers

PMID24134832
PMCPMC3978656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.