ArticleAmerican journal of public health2013
Rethinking the vulnerability of minority populations in research.
Article in American journal of public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Retention of Ethnic Participants in Longitudinal Studies.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2018Pooled it
- Psychosocial predictors of weight regain in the weight loss maintenance trial.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2014Trial
- REACH-OUT: Race, Ethnicity, and Air Pollution in COVID-19 Hospitalization OUTcomes.Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025Article
- The relationship between chronic air pollution exposure, neighborhood environmental vulnerability, and adverse COVID-19 morbidities among hospitalized New York City residents.Environment international · 2025Article
- The Importance of Including Underserved Populations in Research.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Understanding deep disadvantage at the end of life: A nationwide analysis of unclaimed deaths.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Vulnerable Research Participant Policies at U.S. Academic Institutions.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024Article
- Vulnerability in research ethics: A call for assessing vulnerability and implementing protections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- The Impact of Insider Researcher Trainees in Recruiting and Retaining Latinx in an Outdoor Health Promotion Research Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Effects of Sociodemographic Factors on Access to and Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease in the United States.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- Off-White: decentring Whiteness in tobacco science.Tobacco control · 2023Article
- Neighborhood environmental vulnerability and pediatric asthma morbidity in US metropolitan areas.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Article
- IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023Article
- When should global health actors prioritise more uncertain interventions?The Lancet. Global health · 2023Review
- Developing the "Oppression-to-Incarceration Cycle" of Black American and First Nations Australian Trans Women: Applying the Intersectionality Research for Transgender Health Justice Framework.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2023Article
- Core issues, case studies, and the need for expanded Legacy African American genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Case example of a jail-based cancer prevention clinical trial: Social determinants of health framework, novel experimental design, and retention strategies to facilitate long-term follow-up of clinical trial participants.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Recruitment of Community-Based Samples: Experiences and Recommendations for Optimizing Success.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2022Article
- Opening doors to clinical trial participation among Hispanics: Lessons learned from the Spanish translation of ResearchMatch.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Assessment of intimate partner violence abuse ratings by recently abused and never abused women.BMC women's health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Belmont Report, produced in 1979 by a United States government commission, includes minority populations among its list of vulnerable research participants. In this article, we consider some previous attempts to understand the vulnerability of minorities in research, and then provide our own account. First we examine the question of the representation of minorities in research. Then we argue that the best understanding of minorities, vulnerability, and research will begin with a broad understanding of the risk of individual members of minority groups to poor health outcomes. We offer a typology of vulnerability to help with this task. Finally, we show how researchers should be guided by this broad analysis in the design and execution of their research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.