Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24134372›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2013

Research ethics and indigenous communities.

Allyson Kelley, Annie Belcourt-Dittloff, Cheryl Belcourt, Gordon Belcourt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A scoping review of Indigenous community-based research practices, guidelines, and ethical standards.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Why Revise When We Should Reconcile?The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Extending Research Protections to Tribal Communities.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspective Developing Successful Collaborative Research Partnerships with AI/AN Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Building Capacity for Productive Indigenous Community-University Partnerships.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allyson KelleyAll of the authors are affiliated with the Rocky Mountain Tribal Institutional Review Board, Billings, MT. Allyson Kelley is with the Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina, Greensboro. Annie Belcourt-Dittloff is with the Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Montana, Missoula. Cheryl Belcourt and Gordon Belcourt are with the Montana-Wyoming Tribal Leaders Council, Billings, MT.
Annie Belcourt-Dittloff
Cheryl Belcourt
Gordon Belcourt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Institutional review boards (IRBs) function to regulate research for the protection of human participants. We share lessons learned from the development of an intertribal IRB in the Rocky Mountain/Great Plains Tribal region of the United States. We describe the process through which a consortium of Tribes collaboratively developed an intertribal board to promote community-level protection and participation in the research process. In addition, we examine the challenges of research regulation from a Tribal perspective and explore the future of Tribally regulated research that honors indigenous knowledge and promotes community accountability and transparency. We offer recommendations for researchers, funding agencies, and Tribal communities to consider in the review and regulation of research.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationEthics, ResearchIndians, North AmericanResidence CharacteristicsAlaskaEthics Committees, ResearchHumansNorthwestern United StatesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24134372
PMCPMC3828983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.