SynthesisAmerican journal of public health2013
Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.
Synthesis in American journal of public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06182475 (Increasing Equity in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation Through Effective Patient-Provider Communication), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Increasing Equity in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation Through Effective Patient-Provider Communication
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis.Palliative medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.Patient education and counseling · 2023Pooled it
- Outcome Metrics in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged Above 50 Years: A Systematic Review.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Pooled it
- Outcome Metrics in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Pooled it
- Addressing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Individuals With Cancer: An Integrative Review and Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Guideline
- Health literacy in cancer caregivers: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future Directions.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions to improve participation in health-care decisions in non-Western countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Pooled it
- Facilitators and Barriers for Advance Care Planning Among Ethnic and Racial Minorities in the U.S.: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2018Pooled it
- Determinants of Cancer Screening Disparities Among Asian Americans: A Systematic Review of Public Health Surveys.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018Pooled it
- The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2017Pooled it
- Differences in Self-purchased Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use and Patient-reported Satisfaction between Female-specific and Non-female-specific Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer prevention · 2026Article
- Beyond Lip Service: A Position Paper to Truly Stimulate Shared Decision-Making.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- The role of digitalization in health decisions: family and intergenerational perspective.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Prioritizing Patient-Centered Care in a World of Increasingly Advanced Technologies and Disconnected Care.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Facilitating patient-oncologist communication in advanced treatment-resistant cancer: development and feasibility testing of a question prompt list.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Learnings from Racialized Adolescents and Young Adults with Lived Experiences of Cancer: "It's Okay to Critique the System That Claims to Save Us".Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To assess decision-making for cancer treatment among racial/ethnic minority patients, we systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence from studies of "shared decision-making," "cancer," and "minority groups," using PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and EMBASE. We identified significant themes that we compared across studies, refined, and organized into a conceptual model. Five major themes emerged: treatment decision-making, patient factors, family and important others, community, and provider factors. Thematic data overlapped categories, indicating that individuals' preferences for medical decision-making cannot be authentically examined outside the context of family and community. The shared decision-making model should be expanded beyond the traditional patient-physician dyad to include other important stakeholders in the cancer treatment decision process, such as family or community leaders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.