Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24134216›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2014

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of liposomal mifamurtide in adult volunteers with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Yi Liu, Dennis Noe, Jaime Mertz, Michael Bargfrede, Thomas Marbury, Kambiz Farbakhsh, Cristina Oliva, Ashley Milton

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Co-delivery systems: hope for clinical application?Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Review
  6. Building Blocks to Design Liposomal Delivery Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karthik VenkatakrishnanClinical Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Company, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yi Liu
Dennis Noe
Jaime Mertz
Michael Bargfrede
Thomas Marbury
Kambiz Farbakhsh
Cristina Oliva
Ashley Milton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after a single dose of liposomal mifamurtide (liposomal muramyl tripeptide phospatidyl ethanolamine; MEPACT(®)) in adult subjects with mild (Child-Pugh Class A) or moderate (Child-Pugh Class B) hepatic impairment in comparison with age-, weight- and sex-matched healthy subjects with normal hepatic function.

methodsSubjects received a 4 mg dose of liposomal mifamurtide via 1 h intravenous infusion. Blood samples were collected over 72 h for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments (changes in serum interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-α and C-reactive protein).

resultsThirty-seven subjects were enrolled: nine with mild hepatic impairment, eight with moderate hepatic impairment and 20 matched healthy subjects. Geometric least-square mean ratios of total mifamurtide AUCinf for the mild hepatic impairment and moderate hepatic impairment groups vs. matched healthy subjects were 105% (90% confidence interval, 83.6-132%) and 119% (90% confidence interval, 94.1-151%), respectively, which are below the protocol-specified threshold (150%) to require development of dose-modification recommendations. Pharmacodynamic parameters for changes in serum interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α concentrations were generally similar across hepatic function groups. Mifamurtide-induced increases in serum C-reactive protein were attenuated in the moderate hepatic impairment group, consistent with the liver being the major organ of C-reactive protein synthesis. No grade ≥3 adverse events were seen in subjects administered mifamurtide (4 mg).

conclusionsThese results support the conclusion that mild or moderate hepatic impairment does not produce clinically meaningful effects on the clinical pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of mifamurtide; no dose modifications are needed in these special patient populations based on clinical pharmacological considerations.

Indexed as

Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-IsoglutamineAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdultArea Under CurveC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHepatic InsufficiencyHumansInterleukin-6LiposomesMaleMiddle AgedPhosphatidylethanolaminesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAcetylmuramyl-Alanyl-IsoglutamineAdjuvants, ImmunologicC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-6LiposomesmifamurtidePhosphatidylethanolaminesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphahepatic impairmentliposomesMEPACT®mifamurtidepharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID24134216
PMCPMC4093925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.