Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24134166›Full record

ArticleBMC structural biology2013

An analysis of oligomerization interfaces in transmembrane proteins.

Jose M Duarte, Nikhil Biyani, Kumaran Baskaran, Guido Capitani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC structural biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry reveals the role of peripheral myelin protein dimers in peripheral neuropathy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. MENSAdb: a thorough structural analysis of membrane protein dimers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Mcl-1 and Bok transmembrane domains: Unexpected players in the modulation of apoptosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Crystal structures of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose M Duarte
Nikhil Biyani
Kumaran Baskaran
Guido CapitaniLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland. guido.capitani@psi.ch.
Paul Scherrer Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe amount of transmembrane protein (TM) structures solved to date is now large enough to attempt large scale analyses. In particular, extensive studies of oligomeric interfaces in the transmembrane region are now possible.

resultsWe have compiled the first fully comprehensive set of validated transmembrane protein interfaces in order to study their features and assess what differentiates them from their soluble counterparts.

conclusionsThe general features of TM interfaces do not differ much from those of soluble proteins: they are large, tightly packed and possess many interface core residues. In our set, membrane lipids were not found to significantly mediate protein-protein interfaces. Although no G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) was included in the validated set, we analyzed the crystallographic dimerization interfaces proposed in the literature. We found that the putative dimer interfaces proposed for class A GPCRs do not show the usual patterns of stable biological interfaces, neither in terms of evolution nor of packing, thus they likely correspond to crystal interfaces. We cannot however rule out the possibility that they constitute transient or weak interfaces. In contrast we do observe a clear signature of biological interface for the proposed dimer of the class F human Smoothened receptor.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsCrystallography, X-RayHumansMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSmoothened ReceptorMembrane LipidsMembrane ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSmoothened ReceptorSMO protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24134166
PMCPMC4015793
OpenAlexW2111487581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.