Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24133575›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2013

Assessment of different decalcifying protocols on Osteopontin and Osteocalcin immunostaining in whole bone specimens of arthritis rat model by confocal immunofluorescence.

Susana A González-Chávez, César Pacheco-Tena, Cristina E Macías-Vázquez, Eduardo Luévano-Flores

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Rat Model of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susana A González-ChávezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
César Pacheco-Tena
Cristina E Macías-Vázquez
Eduardo Luévano-Flores
Hospital Sanitas CIMA · ESSociedad Española de Medicina Interna · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confocal immunofluorescence is a valuable technique for the detection of relevant molecules in the pathogenesis of arthritis in rat models; however, it requires efficient processing of tissues including bone decalcification. The decalcification process must ensure the complete removal of calcium and also a proper preservation of cellular structures and, specially, the antigenicity of the tissue to allow the immunodetection of the molecules of interest. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of four different decalcifying solutions: the Morse´s solution, 10% EDTA (pH 7.4), 7% HCl/2% EDTA and 5% Nitric acid, as well as four different treatments of the tissues (including microwave irradiation) in the processes of decalcification for large pieces of adult rat bones (hind paw, fore paw, knee and column). We assessed the time of decalcification, the easiness of slicing, the morphological preservation and finally, the antigenicity of two different bone proteins (Osteopontin (OPN) and Osteocalcin (OC)) measured by its immunofluorescence intensity under controlled confocal microscopy conditions. Our results showed that the specimen size and the presence of skin are critical factors for the rate of decalcification, and no significant benefit was found if microwave irradiation is applied to the tissue. The comprehensive statistical analysis showed that the optimal solution for the detection of OPN and OC by confocal immunofluorescence is the 5% Nitric Acid, and followed by 10% EDTA (pH 7.4), Ana Morse solution and 7% HCl/2% EDTA.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthritis, ExperimentalBone and BonesFixativesFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalOsteocalcinOsteopontinRatsRats, WistarFixativesOsteocalcinOsteopontinarthritis rat modelBone decalcificationconfocal immunostainig

Identifiers

PMID24133575
PMCPMC3796219
OpenAlexW67567543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.