Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24133369›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2013

Phase II study of whole brain radiotherapy with or without erlotinib in patients with multiple brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma.

Hongqing Zhuang, Zhiyong Yuan, Jun Wang, Lujun Zhao, Qingsong Pang, Ping Wang

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02284490 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

High-dose Pemetrexed to Treat Lung Adenocarcinoma With Brain Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorRongjie TaoRan2014 to 2017Enrolled25ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmspemetrexed
NCT02556593 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

IMRT Combined With Erlotinib Compared With Whole-brain Radiotherapy for EGFR Wild Type Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With 4-10 Brain Metastases

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled12ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung CarcinomaArmsIMRT, WBRT, erlotinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongqing ZhuangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China ; National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China ; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, People's Republic of China ; Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyong Yuan
Jun Wang
Lujun Zhao
Qingsong Pang
Ping Wang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) versus WBRT concurrent with erlotinib in patients with multiple brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma. WBRT was administered at 30Gy/10f in both arms. In the combination arm, 150 mg erlotinib was given each day, starting the first day of radiotherapy and continuing for 1 month following the end of radiotherapy. Thereafter, pemetrexed or docetaxel monotherapy or the best supportive therapy was given to both arms. The intracranial objective response rate and the local progression-free survival (LPFS) were primary endpoints. Toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. Thirty-one patients in the WBRT group and 23 patients in the combination group were enrolled from November 2009 to December 2011. In the WBRT and the combination arms, respectively, the objective response rate was 54.84% and 95.65% (P = 0.001), the median local progression-free survival was 6.8 months and 10.6 months (P = 0.003), the median PFS was 5.2 months and 6.8 months (P = 0.009), and median OS was 8.9 months and 10.7 months (P = 0.020). In the combination group, there were no differences of LPFS, PFS, and OS between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation patients and EGFR wild-type patients. No Grade 4 or higher side effects were observed in either group. A multivariate analysis indicated that erlotinib was the most important prognostic factor for a prolonged survival. Data showed that erlotinib in combination with WBRT had a tolerable toxicity profile and prolonged the LPFS, PFS, and OS of lung adenocarcinoma patients with multiple brain metastases compared with WBRT monotherapy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlutamatesGuanineDocetaxelErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGlutamatesGuaninePemetrexedQuinazolinesTaxoidserlotinibradiosensitizertyrosine kinase inhibitorWBRT

Identifiers

PMID24133369
PMCPMC3797237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.