Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24133260›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

The neuromuscular transform of the lobster cardiac system explains the opposing effects of a neuromodulator on muscle output.

Alex H Williams, Andrew Calkins, Timothy O'Leary, Renee Symonds, Eve Marder, Patsy S Dickinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Journal of experimental biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex H WilliamsBiology Department and Volen Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, and Neuroscience Program, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine 04011.
Andrew Calkins
Timothy O'Leary
Renee Symonds
Eve Marder
Patsy S Dickinson
Bowdoin College · USBrandeis University · US

Funding

The Maine Biomedical Research Network (INBRE)P20GM103423 · NIGMS · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI Dustin Lynn Updike · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
WNT SIGNALING IN THE DEVELOPING GASTROINTESTINAL TRACTP20RR016463 · NCRR · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI WRAY, CHRISTOPHER C · 2001 to 2011
$41.0M
Variability and Compensation in Reliable Neuronal NetworksR01MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1990 to 2025
$7.8M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR016463-12NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016463NIGMS NIH HHS 8 P20 GM103423-12NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103423NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046742NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH46742-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor neuron activity is transformed into muscle movement through a cascade of complex molecular and biomechanical events. This nonlinear mapping of neural inputs to motor behaviors is called the neuromuscular transform (NMT). We examined the NMT in the cardiac system of the lobster Homarus americanus by stimulating a cardiac motor nerve with rhythmic bursts of action potentials and measuring muscle movements in response to different stimulation patterns. The NMT was similar across preparations, which suggested that it could be used to predict muscle movement from spontaneous neural activity in the intact heart. We assessed this possibility across semi-intact heart preparations in two separate analyses. First, we performed a linear regression analysis across 122 preparations in physiological saline to predict muscle movements from neural activity. Under these conditions, the NMT was predictive of contraction duty cycle but was unable to predict contraction amplitude, likely as a result of uncontrolled interanimal variability. Second, we assessed the ability of the NMT to predict changes in motor output induced by the neuropeptide C-type allatostatin. Wiwatpanit et al. (2012) showed that bath application of C-type allatostatin produced either increases or decreases in the amplitude of the lobster heart contractions. We show that an important component of these preparation-dependent effects can arise from quantifiable differences in the basal state of each preparation and the nonlinear form of the NMT. These results illustrate how properly characterizing the relationships between neural activity and measurable physiological outputs can provide insight into seemingly idiosyncratic effects of neuromodulators across individuals.

Indexed as

AnimalsMotor NeuronsMovementMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNephropidaeNeuromuscular JunctionNeuropeptidesallatostatinNeuropeptides

Identifiers

PMID24133260
PMCPMC3797375
OpenAlexW2082740799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.