Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24133064›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology2014

Physical biology in cancer. 4. Physical cues guide tumor cell adhesion and migration.

Kimberly M Stroka, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Cell physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. How cell migration helps immune sentinels.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Benefits of Zebrafish Xenograft Models in Cancer Research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The extracellular matrix in tumor progression and metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kimberly M StrokaJohns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;
Konstantinos Konstantopoulos

Funding

TRANS NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143868 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, DENIS · 2009 to 2013
$13.7M
T-32 NIH Postdoctoral Training Program in Nanotechnology for Cancer Medicine NTCMT32CA130840 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, DENIS · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
Role of the physical microenvironment in tumor cell migration and the cell cycleF32CA177756 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STROKA, KIMBERLY · 2013 to 2014
$93k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA-177756NCI NIH HHS F32 CA177756NCI NIH HHS T32 CA-130840NCI NIH HHS T32 CA130840NCI NIH HHS U54 CA-143868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As tumor cells metastasize from the primary tumor location to a distant secondary site, they encounter an array of biologically and physically heterogeneous microenvironments. While it is well established that biochemical signals guide all stages of the metastatic cascade, mounting evidence indicates that physical cues also direct tumor cell behavior, including adhesion and migration phenotypes. Physical cues acting on tumor cells in vivo include extracellular matrix mechanical properties, dimensionality, and topography, as well as interstitial flow, hydrodynamic shear stresses, and local forces due to neighboring cells. State-of-the-art technologies have recently enabled us and other researchers to engineer cell microenvironments that mimic specific physical properties of the cellular milieu. Through integration of these engineering strategies, along with physics, molecular biology, and imaging techniques, we have acquired new insights into tumor cell adhesion and migration mechanisms. In this review, we focus on the extravasation and invasion stages of the metastatic cascade. We first discuss the physical role of the endothelium during tumor cell extravasation and invasion and how contractility of endothelial and tumor cells contributes to the ability of tumor cells to exit the vasculature. Next, we examine how matrix dimensionality and stiffness coregulate tumor cell adhesion and migration beyond the vasculature. Finally, we summarize how tumor cells translate and respond to physical cues through mechanotransduction. Because of the critical role of tumor cell mechanotransduction at various stages of the metastatic cascade, targeting signaling pathways involved in tumor cell mechanosensing of physical stimuli may prove to be an effective therapeutic strategy for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Chemical PhenomenaAnimalsCell AdhesionCell MovementHumansMechanotransduction, CellularNeoplasmscell adhesionextravasationmatrix stiffnessthree-dimensional migrationtumor metastasis

Identifiers

PMID24133064
PMCPMC3919991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.