Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24132816›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2013

Is regadenoson an appropriate stressor for MPI in patients with left bundle branch block or pacemakers?

Gregory S Thomas, Carissa R Kinser, Rita Kristy, Jiaqiong Xu, John J Mahmarian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  2. Regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging predicts prognosis in patients with either left bundle branch block or a ventricular paced rhythm.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Myocardial perfusion artifacts in left bundle branch block: A diagnostic challenge.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Severe myocardial ischemia in a patient with diabetes mellitus and left bundle branch block.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory S ThomasMemorialCare Heart & Vascular Institute, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, 2801 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, CA, 90806, USA, gthomas1@memorialcare.org.
Carissa R Kinser
Rita Kristy
Jiaqiong Xu
John J Mahmarian
Astellas Pharma (United States) · USHouston Methodist · USLong Beach Memorial Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with LBBB or ventricular pacemaker undergoing MPI are at risk for false positive MPI results in the setting of an elevated heart rate (HR) with exercise or dobutamine stress. The areas of increased apparent ischemia are typically the LAD and septal territories.

methodsIn a subanalysis of the ADVANCE MPI 1 and 2 studies, perfusion on an initial adenosine and a second MPI study with regadenoson or adenosine was compared by visual and quantitative analysis. Among 2,015 patients, 64 had LBBB and 93 had pacemakers. The hemodynamic response during the second scan was compared in those with and without LBBB and PM.

resultsFollowing regadenoson, peak HR in the LBBB group increased by a mean of 25.4 compared to 15.3 bpm following adenosine (P = .0083). In the pacemaker group HR was blunted, 11.8 and 8.1 following regadenoson and adenosine, respectively (P = .1262). However, the visually assessed summed difference score and the quantitatively assessed extent of ischemia for the LAD and septal territories and the entire LV did not differ between the initial adenosine and subsequent regadenoson scans.

conclusionsThe significant increase in HR observed with regadenoson compared to adenosine did not translate into greater perfusion defects in the LAD or septal territories in patients undergoing regadenoson stress.

Indexed as

Exercise TestPacemaker, ArtificialPurinesPyrazolesAdenosineBlood PressureBundle-Branch BlockHeart RateHumansMyocardial Perfusion ImagingAdenosinePurinesPyrazolesregadenoson

Identifiers

PMID24132816
OpenAlexW2058496842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.