ReviewJournal of biomolecular NMR2013
Equivalence between Euler angle conventions for the description of tensorial interactions in liquid NMR: application to different software programs.
Review in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic fitting of multiple-field solid-state NMR spectra.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2024Article
- FANTEN: a new web-based interface for the analysis of magnetic anisotropy-induced NMR data.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-range orientational restraints derived from alignment or rotational diffusion tensors have greatly contributed to the expansion of applications in biomolecular NMR. The orientation of the principal axis system of these tensors is usually described by the so-called Euler angles. However, no clear consensus has emerged concerning the convention of the associated orthogonal rotations. As a result, the different programs that derive or predict them have adopted different conventions, which make comparison between their results difficult. Moreover, the rotation schemes are seldom completely described. Here, we summarize the different conventions, determine which ones are adopted by commonly used software packages, and establish the formal equivalencies between the different calculated Euler angles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24132779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.