Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24132686›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2014

Combining computational methods for hit to lead optimization in Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug discovery.

Sean Ekins, Joel S Freundlich, Judith V Hobrath, E Lucile White, Robert C Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning Models forMolecular pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  4. Mycobacterium abscessus drug discovery using machine learning.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecule Property Analyses of Active Compounds forJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Data Mining and Computational Modeling of High-Throughput Screening Datasets.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean EkinsCollaborative Drug Discovery, 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 342, Burlingame, California, 94010, USA, ekinssean@yahoo.com.
Joel S Freundlich
Judith V Hobrath
E Lucile White
Robert C Reynolds

Funding

Biocomputation across distributed private datasets to enhance drug discoveryR44TR000942 · NCATS · COLLABORATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY, INC. · PI BUNIN, BARRY A · 2013 to 2018
$2.9M
Targeting MDR-TBRC1AI086677 · NIAID · SOUTHERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REYNOLDS, ROBERT C · 2009 to 2010
$1.0M
Biocomputation across distributed private datasets to enhance drug discoveryR43LM011152 · NLM · COLLABORATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY, INC. · PI BUNIN, BARRY A · 2011 to 2011
$150k
NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR000942NIAID NIH HHS 1RC1AI086677-01NIAID NIH HHS RC1 AI086677NLM NIH HHS R43 LM011152NLM NIH HHS R43 LM011152-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTuberculosis treatments need to be shorter and overcome drug resistance. Our previous large scale phenotypic high-throughput screening against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) has identified 737 active compounds and thousands that are inactive. We have used this data for building computational models as an approach to minimize the number of compounds tested.

methodsA cheminformatics clustering approach followed by Bayesian machine learning models (based on publicly available Mtb screening data) was used to illustrate that application of these models for screening set selections can enrich the hit rate.

resultsIn order to explore chemical diversity around active cluster scaffolds of the dose-response hits obtained from our previous Mtb screens a set of 1924 commercially available molecules have been selected and evaluated for antitubercular activity and cytotoxicity using Vero, THP-1 and HepG2 cell lines with 4.3%, 4.2% and 2.7% hit rates, respectively. We demonstrate that models incorporating antitubercular and cytotoxicity data in Vero cells can significantly enrich the selection of non-toxic actives compared to random selection. Across all cell lines, the Molecular Libraries Small Molecule Repository (MLSMR) and cytotoxicity model identified ~10% of the hits in the top 1% screened (>10 fold enrichment). We also showed that seven out of nine Mtb active compounds from different academic published studies and eight out of eleven Mtb active compounds from a pharmaceutical screen (GSK) would have been identified by these Bayesian models.

conclusionCombining clustering and Bayesian models represents a useful strategy for compound prioritization and hit-to lead optimization of antitubercular agents.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAntitubercular AgentsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DiscoveryHep G2 CellsHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisSmall Molecule LibrariesTuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID24132686
PMCPMC3946937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.