Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24132650›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2013

Epigenetics components of aging in the central nervous system.

Yue-Qiang Zhao, I King Jordan, Victoria V Lunyak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Metabolic disorder in Alzheimer's disease.Metabolic brain disease · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Looking above but not beyond the genome for therapeutics in neurology and psychiatry: epigenetic proteins and RNAs find a new focus.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue-Qiang ZhaoBuck Institute for Research on Aging, 8001 Redwood Boulevard, Novato, CA, 94945-1400, USA.
I King Jordan
Victoria V Lunyak

Funding

Genome-wide analysis of retrotransposons RNA in human adult stem cellsR21AG043921 · NIA · BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING · PI LUNYAK, VICTORIA · 2013 to 2014
$534k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG043921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review highlights recent discoveries that have shaped the emerging viewpoints in the field of epigenetic influences in the central nervous system (CNS), focusing on the following questions: (i) How is the CNS shaped during development when precursor cells transition into morphologically and molecularly distinct cell types, and is this event driven by epigenetic alterations?; ii) How do epigenetic pathways control CNS function?; (iii) What happens to "epigenetic memory" during aging processes, and do these alterations cause CNS dysfunction?; (iv) Can one restore normal CNS function by manipulating the epigenome using pharmacologic agents, and will this ameliorate aging-related neurodegeneration? These and other still unanswered questions remain critical to understanding the impact of multifaceted epigenetic machinery on the age-related dysfunction of CNS.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAgingCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemHumansMemory

Identifiers

PMID24132650
PMCPMC3805869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.