Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24132519›Full record

GuidelineJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2014

Complete republication: National Association of Medical Examiners position paper: Recommendations for the investigation, diagnosis, and certification of deaths related to opioid drugs.

Gregory G Davis, National Association of Medical Examiners and American College of Medical Toxicology Expert Panel on Evaluating and Reporting Opioid Deaths

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Kratom-Associated Pulmonary Toxicity: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Forensic Series with a Proposed Clinical Phenotype Classification.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Rise of Fentanyl: Molecular Aspects and Forensic Investigations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Buprenorphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, and methadone mortality in the United States (2010‒2017).Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2017-2018.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory G Davis
National Association of Medical Examiners and American College of Medical Toxicology Expert Panel on Evaluating and Reporting Opioid Deaths

Funding

Mentoring in Advanced mHealth Technologies and Machine Learning for HIV/Drug Abuse ResearchK24DA037109 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BOYER, EDWARD W · 2014 to 2025
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA037109PHS HHS 00HCUD32011-99784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Medical Toxicology and the National Association of Medical Examiners convened an expert panel to generate evidence-based recommendations for the practice of death investigation and autopsy, toxicological analysis, interpretation of toxicology findings, and death certification to improve the precision of death certificate data available for public health surveillance. The panel finds the following: 1. A complete autopsy is necessary for optimal interpretation of toxicology results, which must also be considered in the context of the circumstances surrounding death, medical history, and scene findings. 2. A complete scene investigation extends to reconciliation of prescription information and pill counts. 3. Blood, urine, and vitreous humor, when available, should be retained in all cases. Blood from the femoral vein is preferable to blood from other sites. 4. A toxicological panel should be comprehensive and include opioid and benzodiazepine analytes, as well as other potent depressant, stimulant, and anti-depressant medications. 5. Interpretation of postmortem opioid concentrations requires correlation with medical history, scene investigation, and autopsy findings. 6. If death is attributed to any drug or combination of drugs (whether as cause or contributing factor), the certifier should list all the responsible substances by generic name in the autopsy report and on the death certificate. 7. The best classification for manner of death in deaths due to the misuse or abuse of opioids without any apparent intent of self-harm is "accident." Reserve "undetermined" as the manner for the rare cases in which evidence exists to support more than one possible determination.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathEvidence-Based MedicineAnalgesics, OpioidAutopsyCoroners and Medical ExaminersCriminologyDeath CertificatesDrug OverdoseForensic ToxicologyGuidelines as TopicHumansSocieties, MedicalTerminology as TopicUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID24132519
PMCPMC3951636
OpenAlexW2257059158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.