Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24132407›Full record

GuidelineCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2013

The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 1--difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient.

J Adam Law, Natasha Broemling, Richard M Cooper, Pierre Drolet, Laura V Duggan, Donald E Griesdale, Orlando R Hung, Philip M Jones, George Kovacs, Simon Massey and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03372707 (Cuff Leak Test and Airway Obstruction in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients Pilot Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
26.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03372707 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Cuff Leak Test and Airway Obstruction in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsLaryngeal EdemaArmsCuff Leak Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 363 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. The difficult airway with recommendations for management--part 2--the anticipated difficult airway.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2013
    Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. High-flow nasal oxygen in anesthesiology practice.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Adam LawDepartment of Anesthesia, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax Infirmary Site, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 3A7, Canada, jlaw@dal.ca.
Natasha Broemling
Richard M Cooper
Pierre Drolet
Laura V Duggan
Donald E Griesdale
Orlando R Hung
Philip M Jones
George Kovacs
Simon Massey
Ian R Morris
Timothy Mullen
Michael F Murphy
Roanne Preston
Viren N Naik
Jeanette Scott
Shean Stacey
Timothy P Turkstra
David T Wong
Canadian Airway Focus Group
Dalhousie University · CAQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously active in the mid-1990s, the Canadian Airway Focus Group (CAFG) studied the unanticipated difficult airway and made recommendations on management in a 1998 publication. The CAFG has since reconvened to examine more recent scientific literature on airway management. The Focus Group's mandate for this article was to arrive at updated practice recommendations for management of the unconscious/induced patient in whom difficult or failed tracheal intubation is encountered.

methodsNineteen clinicians with backgrounds in anesthesia, emergency medicine, and intensive care joined this iteration of the CAFG. Each member was assigned topics and conducted reviews of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Results were presented and discussed during multiple teleconferences and two face-to-face meetings. When appropriate, evidence- or consensus-based recommendations were made together with assigned levels of evidence modelled after previously published criteria.

conclusionsThe clinician must be aware of the potential for harm to the patient that can occur with multiple attempts at tracheal intubation. This likelihood can be minimized by moving early from an unsuccessful primary intubation technique to an alternative "Plan B" technique if oxygenation by face mask or ventilation using a supraglottic device is non-problematic. Irrespective of the technique(s) used, failure to achieve successful tracheal intubation in a maximum of three attempts defines failed tracheal intubation and signals the need to engage an exit strategy. Failure to oxygenate by face mask or supraglottic device ventilation occurring in conjunction with failed tracheal intubation defines a failed oxygenation, "cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate" situation. Cricothyrotomy must then be undertaken without delay, although if not already tried, an expedited and concurrent attempt can be made to place a supraglottic device.

Indexed as

UnconsciousnessAirway ManagementAnesthesiaCanadaCricoid CartilageHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngeal Masks

Identifiers

PMID24132407
PMCPMC3825644
OpenAlexW1709774878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.