Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24132094›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2013

Nice to kin and nasty to non-kin: revisiting Hamilton's early insights on eusociality.

Jacobus J Boomsma, Patrizia d'Ettorre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Inclusive fitness for in-laws.Biology letters · 2018
    Article
  3. Decoding ants' olfactory system sheds light on the evolution of social communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Relatedness modulates reproductive competition among queens in ant societies with multiple queens.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacobus J BoomsmaCentre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, , Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patrizia d'Ettorre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When helping behaviour is costly, Hamiltonian logic implies that animals need to direct helpful acts towards kin, so that indirect fitness benefits justify the costs. We revisit inferences about nepotism and aggression in Hamilton's 1964 paper to argue that he overestimated the general significance of nepotism, but that other issues that he raised continue to suggest novel research agendas today. We now know that nepotism in eusocial insects is rare, because variation in genetic recognition cues is insufficient. A lower proportion of individuals breeding and larger clutch sizes selecting for a more uniform colony odour may explain this. Irreversible worker sterility can induce both the fiercest possible aggression and the highest likelihood of helping random distant kin, but these Hamiltonian contentions still await large-scale testing in social animals.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAltruismAnimalsAntsBiological EvolutionBreedingGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationHumansInsectaMaleModels, GeneticSelection, Geneticclutch sizeGestaltinclusive fitnessnepotismrecognitionunmatedness

Identifiers

PMID24132094
PMCPMC3871339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.