Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24131571›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2013

A case-control study of maternal bathing habits and risk for birth defects in offspring.

A J Agopian, D Kim Waller, Philip J Lupo, Mark A Canfield, Laura E Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impacts of High Environmental Temperatures on Congenital Anomalies: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gastroschisis and Cumulative Stressor Exposures.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A J Agopian
D Kim Waller
Philip J Lupo
Mark A Canfield
Laura E MitchellHuman Genetics Center, Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler Dr,, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Laura.E.Mitchell@uth.tmc.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · USTexas Department of State Health Services · US

Funding

Texas Center for Birth Defects Research and PreventionU01DD000494 · DD · TEXAS STATE DEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES · PI CANFIELD, MARK A · 2009 to 2013
$3.9M
NCBDD CDC HHS 5U01DD000494-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly all women shower or take baths during early pregnancy; however, bathing habits (i.e., shower and bath length and frequency) may be related to the risk of maternal hyperthermia and exposure to water disinfection byproducts, both of which are suspected to increase risk for multiple types of birth defects. Thus, we assessed the relationships between bathing habits during pregnancy and the risk for several nonsyndromic birth defects in offspring.

methodsData for cases with one of 13 types of birth defects and controls from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study delivered during 2000-2007 were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were conducted separately for each type of birth defect.

resultsThere were few associations between shower frequency or bath frequency or length and risk for birth defects in offspring. The risk for gastroschisis in offspring was increased among women who reported showers lasting ≥15 compared to <15 minutes (adjusted odds ratio: 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.72). In addition, we observed modest increases in the risk for spina bifida, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, and limb reduction defects in offspring of women who showered ≥15 compared to <15 minutes. The results of comparisons among more specific categories of shower length (i.e., <15 minutes versus 15-19, 20-29, and ≥ 30 minutes) were similar.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that shower length may be associated with gastroschisis, but the modest associations with other birth defects were not supported by analyses of bath length or bath or shower frequency. Given that showering for ≥15 minutes during pregnancy is very common, further evaluation of the relationship between maternal showering habits and birth defects in offspring is worthwhile.

Indexed as

BathsAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesConfidence IntervalsCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleHabitsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleOdds RatioPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24131571
PMCPMC4015781
OpenAlexW2145108550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.