Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24131485›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2013

A phase I study on combined therapy with proton-beam radiotherapy and in situ tumor vaccination for locally advanced recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

Masato Abei, Toshiyuki Okumura, Kuniaki Fukuda, Takayuki Hashimoto, Masahiro Araki, Kazunori Ishige, Ichinosuke Hyodo, Ayae Kanemoto, Haruko Numajiri, Masashi Mizumoto and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masato Abei
Toshiyuki Okumura
Kuniaki Fukuda
Takayuki Hashimoto
Masahiro Araki
Kazunori Ishige
Ichinosuke Hyodo
Ayae Kanemoto
Haruko Numajiri
Masashi Mizumoto
Takeji Sakae
Hideyuki Sakurai
Junko Zenkoh
Gerelchuluun Ariungerel
Yu Sogo
Atsuo Ito
Tadao Ohno
Koji TsuboiProton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennohdai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan. tsuboi-k@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
University of Tsukuba · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPIbaraki Prefectural Central Hospital · JPWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton-beam radiotherapy (PBT) has been shown to be effective to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a nonsurgical local treatment option. However, HCC still remains as one of the most difficult cancers to be cured because of frequent recurrences. Thus, methods to inhibit the recurrence need to be explored. To prevent the HCC recurrence, we here report on a prospective phase I study of 'in situ' tumor vaccination using CalTUMP, a newly developed immunoadjuvant consisting of BCG extract bound to hydroxyapatite and microparticulated tuberculin, following local PBT for HCC.

methodsPatients with locally advanced recurrent HCC, which had been heavily pretreated with various treatments, were enrolled. PBT was performed with the conventional method to the target HCC. Subsequently, CalTUMP was injected into the same irradiated-tumor three times at one-week intervals. Three dose-levels of CalTUMP (1/10, 1/3, and 1/1) were administered to 3 patients each. Vital signs, blood samples, ultrasound, and computed tomographic scans were monitored to evaluate the safety.

resultsThree intratumoral injections of CalTUMP following PBT (median dose: 72.6 GyE) were accomplished in 9 patients. Transient low-grade fever and minor laboratory changes were observed in 7 patients after CalTUMP injections. No other treatment-related adverse events were observed. Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (range: 2.1-14.2) and 4 patients were progression-free for more than 1 year.

conclusionsIntratumoral injection of CalTUMP following PBT was feasible and safe in patients with heavily pre-treated HCC. Further clinical studies to evaluate the efficacy of this in situ tumor vaccination are warranted.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAgedCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, HepatocellularCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDurapatiteFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium bovisProton TherapyTuberculinVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesDurapatiteTuberculin

Identifiers

PMID24131485
PMCPMC3854490
OpenAlexW2108155672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.