ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2013
Minimally invasive management of pancreatic pseudocysts.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transpapillary drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single center experience.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2016Article
- Transpapillary drainage of pancreatic parenchymal necrosis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2015Article
- Urgent laparoscopic gastrocystostomy after iatrogenic perforation of pancreatic cyst - case report and literature review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2015Article
- The significance of ductoscopy of mammary ducts in the diagnostics of breast neoplasms.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2015Article
- Successful surgical internal drainage of postoperative pancreatic pseudocyst through pancreaticojejunostomy with distal pancreatectomy: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2015Article
- Laparoscopic vs Open Cystogastrostomy for Symptomatic Pseudocyst of Pancreas: A Comparative Study of Surgical Outcomes.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) are the current minimally invasive management options. Indications, and early and late results of endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches are being discussed.
aimTo present experience in treatment of PP by laparoscopic pseudocystogastrostomy (LPGS) and endoscopic pseudocystogastrostomy (EPGS) and to compare results, feasibility and safety. MATERIAL AND
methodsTHIRTY PATIENTS UNDERWENT SURGICAL
intervention18 patients - LPGS (group I), 12 - EPGS (group II). Groups were compared by age, gender, pancreatic pseudocysts's age, diameter and localization, as well as intraoperative, early and late postoperative complications.
resultsGENDER DISTRIBUTION, GROUP I: 14 (77.8%) men and 4 (22.2%) women, group II: 4 (33.3%) men and 8 (66.7%) women, p = 0.02. Average cyst diameter: group I - 149.9 ±52.1 mm, group II - 119 ±37.9 mm, p = 0.07. Average time between diagnosis and operation performance: group I - 12 (3-60) months, group II - 8 (2-36) months, p = 0.19. Neither in group I nor in group II did intraoperative complications occur. Early postoperative complications were divided into minor and major. Early minor complications: group I - 2 (11.1%), group II - 0, p = 0.5. Early major complications: group I - 0, group II - 2 (16.7%), p = 0.15. Late postoperative complications: group I - 0, group II - 1 (8.3%), p = 0.4. In group I there was no case, whereas in II group there was 1 (8.3%) case of recidivation, p = 0.4.
conclusionsFor selected patients both minimally invasive methods are equally safe an effective. For comprehensive evaluation of methods prospective trials are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.