ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Simple topological features reflect dynamics and modularity in protein interaction networks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The signed two-space proximity model for learning representations in protein-protein interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Protein conformational switch discerned via network centrality properties.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Identification of Crucial Candidate Genes and Pathways in Glioblastoma Multiform by Bioinformatics Analysis.Biomolecules · 2019Article
- Self-organizing scale-free patterns in a phase-modulated periodic connecting system.BMC research notes · 2019Article
- Exploiting locational and topological overlap model to identify modules in protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Biomarker panels for characterizing microbial community biofilm formation as composite molecular process.PloS one · 2018Article
- Unified Alignment of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Genome-Wide Detection and Analysis of Multifunctional Genes.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Biological Relevance and Therapeutic Potential of the Hypusine Modification System.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Article
- Merging and scoring molecular interactions utilising existing community standards: tools, use-cases and a case study.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Article
- Dynamic modularity of host protein interaction networks in Salmonella Typhi infection.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The availability of large-scale protein-protein interaction networks for numerous organisms provides an opportunity to comprehensively analyze whether simple properties of proteins are predictive of the roles they play in the functional organization of the cell. We begin by re-examining an influential but controversial characterization of the dynamic modularity of the S. cerevisiae interactome that incorporated gene expression data into network analysis. We analyse the protein-protein interaction networks of five organisms, S. cerevisiae, H. sapiens, D. melanogaster, A. thaliana, and E. coli, and confirm significant and consistent functional and structural differences between hub proteins that are co-expressed with their interacting partners and those that are not, and support the view that the former tend to be intramodular whereas the latter tend to be intermodular. However, we also demonstrate that in each of these organisms, simple topological measures are significantly correlated with the average co-expression of a hub with its partners, independent of any classification, and therefore also reflect protein intra- and inter- modularity. Further, cross-interactomic analysis demonstrates that these simple topological characteristics of hub proteins tend to be conserved across organisms. Overall, we give evidence that purely topological features of static interaction networks reflect aspects of the dynamics and modularity of interactomes as well as previous measures incorporating expression data, and are a powerful means for understanding the dynamic roles of hubs in interactomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.