Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24130354›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2013

Dose-response effect of fruit and vegetables on insulin resistance in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Ian R Wallace, Claire T McEvoy, Steven J Hunter, Lesley L Hamill, Cieran N Ennis, Patrick M Bell, Chris C Patterson, Jayne V Woodside, Ian S Young, Michelle C McKinley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00874341 (Dose-Response Effect of Fruit and Vegetables on Insulin Resistance in Healthy People Who Are Overweight and at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00874341 phase1completednot on this map

Dose-Response Effect of Fruit and Vegetables on Insulin Resistance in Healthy People Who Are Overweight and at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2009 to 2011Enrolled105ConditionsCardiovascular DiseaseArmsFruit and vegetable intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Meeting report: plant-rich dietary patterns and health.The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Prevention of metabolic diseases: fruits (including fruit sugars) vs. vegetables.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian R WallaceCorresponding author: Michelle C. McKinley, m.mckinley@qub.ac.uk.
Claire T McEvoy
Steven J Hunter
Lesley L Hamill
Cieran N Ennis
Patrick M Bell
Chris C Patterson
Jayne V Woodside
Ian S Young
Michelle C McKinley
University of Ulster · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0901530Medical Research Council G0901793Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the dose-response effect of fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake on insulin resistance (IR) in people who are overweight and at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA total of 105 participants (mean age 56 years) followed a 4-week washout diet (one to two portions of F&Vs per day). Ninety-two participants completed the washout and were randomized to receive one to two, four, or seven portions of F&Vs per day for 12 weeks. IR was assessed at the start and end of this 12-week period by the two-step euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Compliance was monitored using a combination of 4-day food diaries and plasma biomarkers of F&V intake.

resultsA total of 89 participants completed the study. Participants attained self-reported F&V intakes of 1.8, 3.8, and 7.0 portions per day (P < 0.001) per group. There was a significant linear increase in serum lutein status across the groups, indicating good compliance (P < 0.001), and body weight was maintained (P = 0.77). No significant difference was found between groups in terms of a change in measures of whole-body, peripheral, or hepatic IR or adiponectin multimers.

conclusionsIncreased consumption of F&Vs, as advocated in public-health advice, has no effect on IR in overweight individuals who are at high risk of CVD when body weight is maintained. Recent evidence from systematic reviews indicates that particular classes or types of F&Vs may have particular antidiabetic properties; hence, it is possible that benefits may only be observed in response to a more specific fruit or vegetable intervention.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFruitInsulin ResistanceVegetablesBiomarkersBody WeightCardiovascular DiseasesDiet RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOverweightRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24130354
PMCPMC3836143
OpenAlexW1999879149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.