Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24130255›Full record

Trial reportJournal of oncology practice2013

Coaching intervention as a strategy for minority recruitment to cancer clinical trials.

Paula M Fracasso, Sherry A Goodner, Allison N Creekmore, Helen P Morgan, Denise M Foster, Angela A Hardmon, Seth J Engel, Brian C Springer, Katherine J Mathews, Edwin B Fisher and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of oncology practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Overcoming Barriers: Evidence-Based Strategies to Increase Enrollment of Underrepresented Populations in Cancer Therapeutic Clinical Trials-a Narrative Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adaptation of a Cancer Clinical Trials Education Program for African American and Latina/o Community Members.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paula M FracassoAlvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Sherry A Goodner
Allison N Creekmore
Helen P Morgan
Denise M Foster
Angela A Hardmon
Seth J Engel
Brian C Springer
Katherine J Mathews
Edwin B Fisher
Mark S Walker
Jewish Hospital · USBarnes-Jewish Hospital · US

Funding

Overcoming Barriers to Early Phase Clinical TrialsR21CA101725 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FRACASSO, PAULA M · 2003 to 2004
$408k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA101725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLack of trust and rapport with health care providers has been identified in the under-representation of racial/ethnic minorities within clinical trials. Our study used a coach to promote trust among minority patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsMinority patients with advanced breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive a coach Intervention (CI) or usual care (UC). All patients completed baseline and 6-month telephone interviews to assess demographics, trust in health care providers, attitudes toward clinical trials, and quality of life. Patients randomly assigned to CI were assigned a coach, who made biweekly contacts for 6 months to address general issues, progress or development in cancer care, and available resources. Patients randomly assigned to UC received the standard of care, without this intervention. Clinical trial enrollment was assessed.

resultsOver 21 months, we screened 268 patients and enrolled 73 African Americans and two Asian Americans. Patients were randomly assigned to CI (n = 38) or to UC (n = 37). Longitudinal analyses were conducted on 69 patients who completed the 6-month follow-up assessment. Trial enrollment was 16 and 13 patients for the CI and UC groups, respectively. This difference was not significant (P = .351). Higher quality of life (1-point odds ratio on Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General = 1.033, P = .036) and positive attitudes toward trials predicted enrollment. There was no significant difference between these groups in quality of life, attitudes toward clinical trials, perceptions of racism, trust in doctors, or depression.

conclusionsQuality of life and positive attitude toward trials predicted trial enrollment, regardless of assignment to CI or UC.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsianAttitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsNeoplasmsPatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID24130255
PMCPMC3825290
OpenAlexW2100205022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.