ArticleJournal of oncology practice2013
The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.
Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mychoice: Testing an Interactive mHealth Tool to Enhance Communication and Informed Decision Making About Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Patients
New IDEAS: Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning Study - A Study to Improve Precision in Amyloid PET Coverage and Patient Care
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Do Tobacco Treatment Trials Address Disparities in Smoking Outcomes Among Black and Hispanic Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review of Smoking Cessation Interventions for Black and Hispanic Patients Diagnosed with Cancer.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Pooled it
- Use of Video Education Interventions to Increase Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2021Pooled it
- Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2021Pooled it
- Priorities for Rural Lymphoma Survivors: A Qualitative Study.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2020Trial
- Effect of an Educational Video to Increase Calls and Screening into an Anal Cancer Clinical Trial Among HIV+ Hispanics in PR: Results from a Randomized Controlled Behavioral Trial.AIDS and behavior · 2019Trial
- Participant characteristics and clinical trial decision-making factors in AIDS malignancy consortium treatment trials for HIV-infected persons with cancer (AMC #S006).HIV clinical trials · 2018Trial
- Recruiting Endometrial Cancer Survivors to Studies Examining Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018Trial
- Empowering Latina breast cancer patients to make informed decisions about clinical trials: a pilot study.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Trial
- Progress and challenges in expanding access to clinical trials in pancreatic cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Implementing a national clinical trial navigator program: a qualitative CFIR analysis of barriers and facilitators from the perspective of people with lived cancer experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Perspectives on GUIDE (Guiding participation toward understanding, inclusion, diversity, and equity for cancer trials): a clinical trial access intervention.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the performance of clinical research networks to improve the success of cancer clinical trials: A scoping review and organizational analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Transforming patient recruitment in clinical trials: Communication training to manage uncertainties about risks and benefits.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Variations in interest to participate in health research: Insights from the Florida Statewide Registry for Aging Studies (FSRAS).Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health · 2025Article
- The feasibility of the Community health worker Outreach and Navigation Network for Enhancing representation in Clinical Trials (CONNECT) model: A community-physician engagement approach for increasing representation in clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Facilitation of Enrollment onto Cancer Clinical Trials Using a Novel Navigator-Assisted Program: A Cross-Sectional Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany challenges to clinical trial accrual exist, resulting in studies with inadequate enrollment and potentially delaying answers to important scientific and clinical questions.
methodsThe National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) cosponsored the Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: Science and Solutions on April 29-30, 2010 to examine the state of accrual science related to patient/community, physician/provider, and site/organizational influences, and identify new interventions to facilitate clinical trial enrollment. The symposium featured breakout sessions, plenary sessions, and a poster session including 100 abstracts. Among the 358 attendees were clinical investigators, researchers of accrual strategies, research administrators, nurses, research coordinators, patient advocates, and educators. A bibliography of the accrual literature in these three major areas was provided to participants in advance of the meeting. After the symposium, the literature in these areas was revisited to determine if the symposium recommendations remained relevant within the context of the current literature.
resultsFew rigorously conducted studies have tested interventions to address challenges to clinical trials accrual. Attendees developed recommendations for improving accrual and identified priority areas for future accrual research at the patient/community, physician/provider, and site/organizational levels. Current literature continues to support the symposium recommendations.
conclusionsA combination of approaches addressing both the multifactorial nature of accrual challenges and the characteristics of the target population may be needed to improve accrual to cancer clinical trials. Recommendations for best practices and for future research developed from the symposium are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.