Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24130183›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2013

Amacrine cell subtypes differ in their intrinsic neurite growth capacity.

Noelia J Kunzevitzky, Kevin T Willeford, William J Feuer, Monica V Almeida, Jeffrey L Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Primary Cilia in Amacrine Cells in Retinal Development.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DSCAM promotes refinement in the mouse retina through cell death and restriction of exploring dendrites.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noelia J KunzevitzkyShiley Eye Center, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kevin T Willeford
William J Feuer
Monica V Almeida
Jeffrey L Goldberg

Funding

Vision BiostatisticsP30EY022589 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Derek Stuart Welsbie · 2012 to 2026
$10.3M
Synapses,Channels, and Transduction in NeuroscienceT32NS007044 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MULLER, KENNETH J · 1985 to 2010
$2.2M
DEVELOPMENTAL CONTROL OF AXON REGENERATION IN RGCsR01NS061348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GOLDBERG, JEFFREY L · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Intrinsic Molecular Control of Axon Regeneration In RGCsR03EY016790 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GOLDBERG, JEFFREY L · 2005 to 2007
$447k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014081NEI NIH HHS P30 EY022589NEI NIH HHS R03 EY016790NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061348NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmacrine cell neurite patterning has been extensively studied in vivo, and more than 30 subpopulations with varied morphologies have been identified in the mammalian retina. It is not known, however, whether the complex amacrine cell morphology is determined intrinsically, is signaled by extrinsic cues, or both.

methodsHere we purified rat amacrine cell subpopulations away from their retinal neighbors and glial-derived factors to ask questions about their intrinsic neurite growth ability. In defined medium strongly trophic for amacrine cells in vitro, we characterized survival and neurite growth of amacrine cell subpopulations defined by expression of specific markers.

resultsWe found that a series of amacrine cell subtype markers are developmentally regulated, turning on through early postnatal development. Subtype marker expression was observed in similar fractions of cultured amacrine cells as was observed in vivo, and was maintained with time in culture. Overall, amacrine cell neurite growth followed principles very similar to those in postnatal retinal ganglion cells, but embryonic retinal ganglion cells demonstrated different features, relating to their rapid axon growth. Surprisingly, the three subpopulations of amacrine cells studied in vitro recapitulated quantitatively and qualitatively the varied morphologies they have in vivo.

conclusionsOur data suggest that cultured amacrine cells maintain intrinsic fidelity to their identified in vivo subtypes, and furthermore, that cell-autonomous, intrinsic factors contribute to the regulation of neurite patterning.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAmino Acid Transport System X-AGAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiomarkersCalbindin 2Cell LineageCells, CulturedCell SeparationCell SurvivalConotoxinsFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeuritesNeurogenesisParvalbuminsalpha-conotoxin Vc1.1Amino Acid Transport System X-AGBiomarkersCalb2 protein, ratCalbindin 2ConotoxinsParvalbuminsStx1a protein, ratSyntaxin 1amacrine cellsintrinsic neurite growthneurite patterningretinal development

Identifiers

PMID24130183
PMCPMC3832218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.