Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24129806›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2014

Enhanced fidelity to treatment for bipolar disorder: results from a randomized controlled implementation trial.

Jeanette Waxmonsky, Amy M Kilbourne, David E Goodrich, Kristina M Nord, Zongshan Lai, Christina Laird, Julia Clogston, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Christopher Miller, Mark S Bauer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01487668 nacompletednot on this map

Life Goals Collaborative Care to Improve Health Outcomes in Mental Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2011 to 2015Enrolled304ConditionsBipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizoaffective DisorderArmsLife Goals Collaborative Care
NCT02543840 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Hybrid Controlled Trial to Implement Collaborative Care in General Mental Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Boston Healthcare SystemRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,112ConditionsMental Health DisordersArmsReplicating Effective Programs plus External Facilitation, Educational Materials
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeanette Waxmonsky
Amy M Kilbourne
David E Goodrich
Kristina M Nord
Zongshan Lai
Christina Laird
Julia Clogston
Hyungjin Myra Kim
Christopher Miller
Mark S Bauer
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Implementing Chronic Care Management for Bipolar DisorderR01MH079994 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KILBOURNE, AMY M · 2008 to 2012
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors compared fidelity to bipolar disorder treatment at community practices that received a standard or enhanced version of a novel implementation intervention called Replicating Effective Programs (REP).

methodsFive community practices in Michigan and Colorado were assigned at random to receive enhanced (N=3) or standard (N=2) REP to help implement Life Goals Collaborative Care (LGCC), a psychosocial intervention consisting of four self-management support group sessions, ongoing care management contacts by phone, and dissemination of guidelines to providers. Standard REP includes an intervention package consisting of an outline, a treatment manual and implementation guide, a standard training program, and as-needed technical assistance. Enhanced REP added customization of the treatment manual and ongoing, proactive technical assistance from internal and external facilitators. Multiple and logistic regression analyses determined the impact of enhanced versus standard REP on patient-level fidelity.

resultsThe participants (N=384) had a mean age of 42 years; 67% were women, and 30% were nonwhite. Participants attended an average of three group sessions and had an average of four care management contacts. After adjustment for patient factors, enhanced REP was associated with 2.6 (p<.001) times more total sessions and contacts than standard REP, which was driven by 2.5 (p<.01) times more care management contacts. Women and participants with a history of homelessness had fewer total sessions and contacts.

conclusionsEnhanced REP was associated with improved LGCC fidelity, primarily for care management contacts. Additional customization of interventions such as LGCC may be needed to ensure adequate treatment fidelity for vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Comparative Effectiveness ResearchDisease ManagementAdultBipolar DisorderCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSelf CareSelf-Help Groups

Identifiers

PMID24129806
PMCPMC4155734
OpenAlexW2114753480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.