Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24129710›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

(11)C-acetate as a new biomarker for PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: initial staging and postinduction response assessment.

Chieh Lin, Chi-Lai Ho, Shu-Hang Ng, Po-Nan Wang, Yenlin Huang, Yu-Chun Lin, Tzung-Chih Tang, Shu-Fan Tsai, Alain Rahmouni, Tzu-Chen Yen

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prospective Pilot Study ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Optimization of whole-body 2-[European radiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Prognostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Nuclear medicine imaging of multiple myeloma, particularly in the relapsed setting.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  17. Evaluating Acetate Metabolism for Imaging and Targeting in Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. New Approaches to Molecular Imaging of Multiple Myeloma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Chieh LinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5 Fusing Street, Gueishan, 33305, Taiwan.
Chi-Lai Ho
Shu-Hang Ng
Po-Nan Wang
Yenlin Huang
Yu-Chun Lin
Tzung-Chih Tang
Shu-Fan Tsai
Alain Rahmouni
Tzu-Chen Yen
Chang Gung University · TWMemorial Hospital of South Bend · USChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRHong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated the potential value of (11)C-acetate (ACT) PET/CT in characterizing multiple myeloma (MM) compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Bone marrow histological and whole-body (WB) MRI findings served as the reference standards.

methodsIn this prospective study, 15 untreated MM patients (10 men and 5 women, age range 48-69 years) underwent dual-tracer (11)C-ACT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT and WB MRI for pretreatment staging, and 13 of them had repeated examinations after induction therapy. Diffuse and focal bone marrow uptake was assessed by visual and quantitative analyses, including measurement of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Between-group differences and correlations were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson test.

resultsAt staging, all 15 patients had diffuse myeloma involvement upon bone marrow examination with 30-90 % of plasma cell infiltrates. Diffuse infiltration was detected in all of them (100 %) using (11)C-ACT with a positive correlation between bone marrow uptake values and percentages of plasma cell infiltrates (r = +0.63, p=0.01). In contrast, a diagnosis of diffuse infiltration could be established using (18)F-FDG in only six patients (40 %). Focal lesions were shown in 13 patients on both (11)C-ACT PET/CT and WB MRI, and in 10 patients on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Focal lesions demonstrated (11)C-ACT uptake with a mean SUVmax of 11.4 ± 3.3 (range 4.6-19.6, n=59), which was significantly higher than the (18)F-FDG uptake (mean SUVmax 6.6 ± 3.1, range 2.3-13.7, n=29; p<0.0001). After treatment, the diffuse bone marrow (11)C-ACT uptake showed a mean SUVmax reduction of 66 % in patients with at least a very good partial response versus 34 % in those with at most a partial response only (p=0.01).

conclusionPET/CT using (11)C-ACT as a biomarker showed a higher detection rate for both diffuse and focal myeloma lesions at diagnosis than using (18)F-FDG, and may be valuable for response assessment.

Indexed as

AcetatesInduction ChemotherapyMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedCarbon RadioisotopesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm StagingPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAcetatesCarbon Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID24129710
OpenAlexW2093594450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.