Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2014
Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children and adolescents following age-adapted dosing.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Intraventricular etoposide safety and toxicity profile in children and young adults with refractory or recurrent malignant brain tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Trial
- Drug delivery in leptomeningeal disease: Navigating barriers and beyond.Drug delivery · 2024Review
- State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
- Advances in Intrathecal Nanoparticle Delivery: Targeting the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier for Enhanced CNS Drug Delivery.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comprehensive Therapeutic Approaches to Tuberculous Meningitis: Pharmacokinetics, Combined Dosing, and Advanced Intrathecal Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Retrospective National "Real Life" Experience of the SFCE with the Metronomic MEMMAT and MEMMAT-like Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Management of CNS Disease in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022Review
- Polymeric and Lipid Nanoparticles: Which Applications in Pediatrics?Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Novel Insights into Diagnosis, Biology and Treatment of Primary Diffuse Leptomeningeal Melanomatosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Potential Importance of Early Focal Radiotherapy Following Gross Total Resection for Long-Term Survival in Children With Embryonal Tumors With Multilayered Rosettes.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Liposomal Cytarabine Induces Less Neurocognitive Dysfunction Than Intrathecal Methotrexate in an Animal Model.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology · 2018Article
- Review
- Safety of Ommaya reservoirs in children with brain tumors: a 20-year experience with 5472 intraventricular drug administrations in 98 patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014Article
- Pharmacokinetics of nanotechnology-based formulations in pediatric populations.Advanced drug delivery reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAssessment of the optimal drug dose for intrathecal therapy in children is challenging because of the non-linear increase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume throughout childhood and potential differences in the elimination rate in children versus adults. The present study was designed to prospectively collect pharmacokinetic and safety data on age-adapted intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children aged >3 years. PATIENTS AND
methodsSixteen patients with malignant brain tumours were included in the study. Children aged 3-10 years received liposomal cytarabine 35 mg with concomitant dexamethasone, and those aged >10 years received 50 mg. Serial CSF and plasma samples were collected before administration and 1 h, 12 h, 24 h, 1 week and 2 weeks post-dosing. CSF was analysed for free and encapsulated cytarabine, and plasma was analysed for free cytarabine.
resultsThe average elimination half-life values in children aged 3-10 years and in those aged >10 years, treated with liposomal cytarabine 35 mg and 50 mg, respectively, were 40.9 and 43.7 h for free cytarabine and 31.5 and 36.4 h for encapsulated cytarabine in CSF. Although these values were lower than those previously reported, cytarabine concentrations exceeded the cytotoxic threshold of 0.1 mg/L in all patients until 1 week post-intraventricular administration. Cytarabine concentrations in plasma were negligible. In general, liposomal cytarabine was well tolerated, with relevant but manageable toxicities.
conclusionLiposomal cytarabine in doses of 35 mg for children aged 3-10 years and 50 mg for older patients shows sufficient drug exposure for at least 1 week and appears to be well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24129691What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.