Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24129691›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2014

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children and adolescents following age-adapted dosing.

Andreas Peyrl, Robert Sauermann, Monika Chocholous, Amedeo A Azizi, Walter Jäger, Martina Höferl, Irene Slavc

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. State of the art in pediatric nanomedicines.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Management of CNS Disease in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas PeyrlDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Robert Sauermann
Monika Chocholous
Amedeo A Azizi
Walter Jäger
Martina Höferl
Irene Slavc

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAssessment of the optimal drug dose for intrathecal therapy in children is challenging because of the non-linear increase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume throughout childhood and potential differences in the elimination rate in children versus adults. The present study was designed to prospectively collect pharmacokinetic and safety data on age-adapted intrathecal liposomal cytarabine in children aged >3 years. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixteen patients with malignant brain tumours were included in the study. Children aged 3-10 years received liposomal cytarabine 35 mg with concomitant dexamethasone, and those aged >10 years received 50 mg. Serial CSF and plasma samples were collected before administration and 1 h, 12 h, 24 h, 1 week and 2 weeks post-dosing. CSF was analysed for free and encapsulated cytarabine, and plasma was analysed for free cytarabine.

resultsThe average elimination half-life values in children aged 3-10 years and in those aged >10 years, treated with liposomal cytarabine 35 mg and 50 mg, respectively, were 40.9 and 43.7 h for free cytarabine and 31.5 and 36.4 h for encapsulated cytarabine in CSF. Although these values were lower than those previously reported, cytarabine concentrations exceeded the cytotoxic threshold of 0.1 mg/L in all patients until 1 week post-intraventricular administration. Cytarabine concentrations in plasma were negligible. In general, liposomal cytarabine was well tolerated, with relevant but manageable toxicities.

conclusionLiposomal cytarabine in doses of 35 mg for children aged 3-10 years and 50 mg for older patients shows sufficient drug exposure for at least 1 week and appears to be well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdolescentAgingAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCytarabineFemaleHumansInjections, SpinalLiposomesMaleAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabineLiposomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.