ArticlePreventive medicine2013
American adults eligible for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program consume more sugary beverages than ineligible adults.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dietary Quality of Americans by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Federal Food Program Participation and Beverage Intake Among Families With Low Household Income.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2023Article
- Factors Influencing the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake of Caregivers of Adolescents in Appalachia.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2022Article
- An Exploration of the Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage in Promoting Obesity and Health Disparities.Current obesity reports · 2021Review
- Is healthy eating too expensive?: How low-income parents evaluate the cost of food.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020Article
- Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Dietary Behaviors: Role of Community Food Environment.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2019Article
- Grocery Stores Are Not Associated with More Healthful Food for Participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2019Article
- Shopping pattern and food purchase differences among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) households and Non-supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program households in the United States.Preventive medicine reports · 2017Article
- Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2017Article
- Impact of Food Assistance Programs on Obesity in Mothers and Children: A Prospective Cohort Study in Peru.American journal of public health · 2016Article
- Public Health and Legal Arguments in Favor of a Policy to Cap the Portion Sizes of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Fruit and vegetable consumption and food values: National patterns in the United States by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility and cooking frequency.Preventive medicine · 2015Article
- Associations between depressive symptomatology, diet, and body mass index among participants in the supplemental nutrition assistance program.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is considerable debate about whether sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) should be allowable purchases with benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). PURPOSE: To examine national patterns in adult consumption of SSBs by SNAP eligibility.
methodsCross-sectional analysis of 24-hour dietary recall data obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2010 (N=17,198), analyzed in 2013.
resultsIn 2003-2010, 65% of adults receiving SNAP consumed SSBs, averaging 307 cal daily, and 74 g of sugar. Compared to adults ineligible for SNAP, adults receiving SNAP consumed a higher percentage of SSBs (65% vs. 59%, p<0.001), more calories from SSB per capita (210 kcal vs. 175 kcal, p=0.001), and more daily calories from SSBs among drinkers (307 kcal vs. 278 kcal, p=0.008). Overall, per capita consumption from SSBs was highest among adults receiving SNAP (210 kcal, 9% total daily intake), followed by adults eligible but not participating in SNAP (192 kcal, 8% total daily intake)--both of which had significantly higher SSB consumption than ineligible adults (175 kcal, 8% total daily intake) (p<0.05).
conclusionAdults eligible for SNAP benefits consume more SSBs than ineligible adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.