Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24128737›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2014

Genetic effects on the cerebellar role in working memory: same brain, different genes?

Gabriëlla A M Blokland, Katie L McMahon, Paul M Thompson, Ian B Hickie, Nicholas G Martin, Greig I de Zubicaray, Margaret J Wright

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-wide association study of working memory brain activation.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Very Early Brain Damage Leads to Remodeling of the Working Memory System in Adulthood: A Combined fMRI/Tractography Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Genetics and brain morphology.Neuropsychology review · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriëlla A M BloklandGenetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: gabriella.blokland@uqconnect.edu.au.
Katie L McMahonCentre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul M ThompsonLaboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ian B HickieBrain & Mind Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas G MartinGenetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Greig I de ZubicaraySchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Margaret J WrightGenetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUNational Imaging Facility · AUUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

TR&D3: Intrinsic Surface MappingP41EB015922 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2012 to 2022
$14.1M
Genetic influences on the brain: A twin imaging studyR01HD050735 · NICHD · QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI WRIGHT, MARGARET JANE · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015922NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several years, evidence has accumulated showing that the cerebellum plays a significant role in cognitive function. Here we show, in a large genetically informative twin sample (n=430; aged 16-30years), that the cerebellum is strongly, and reliably (n=30 rescans), activated during an n-back working memory task, particularly lobules I-IV, VIIa Crus I and II, IX and the vermis. Monozygotic twin correlations for cerebellar activation were generally much larger than dizygotic twin correlations, consistent with genetic influences. Structural equation models showed that up to 65% of the variance in cerebellar activation during working memory is genetic (averaging 34% across significant voxels), most prominently in the lobules VI, and VIIa Crus I, with the remaining variance explained by unique/unshared environmental factors. Heritability estimates for brain activation in the cerebellum agree with those found for working memory activation in the cerebral cortex, even though cerebellar cyto-architecture differs substantially. Phenotypic correlations between BOLD percent signal change in cerebrum and cerebellum were low, and bivariate modeling indicated that genetic influences on the cerebellum are at least partly specific to the cerebellum. Activation on the voxel-level correlated very weakly with cerebellar gray matter volume, suggesting specific genetic influences on the BOLD signal. Heritable signals identified here should facilitate discovery of genetic polymorphisms influencing cerebellar function through genome-wide association studies, to elucidate the genetic liability to brain disorders affecting the cerebellum.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebellumFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermNerve NetTwinsYoung AdultCerebellumFunctional MRIGeneticsHeritabilityTwin studyWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID24128737
PMCPMC3925745
OpenAlexW2167057875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.