Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24128374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2014

The impact of patients' gender, race, and age on health care professionals' pain management decisions: an online survey using virtual human technology.

Laura D Wandner, Marc W Heft, Benjamin C Lok, Adam T Hirsh, Steven Z George, Anne L Horgas, James W Atchison, Calia A Torres, Michael E Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex bias in pain management decisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. A retrospective review of post-intubation sedation and analgesia practices in a South African private ambulance service.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Patient Race, Ethnicity, Language, and Pain Severity in Primary Care: A Retrospective Electronic Health Record Study.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura D WandnerDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Marc W HeftCollege of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Benjamin C LokComputer and Information Science and Engineering Department, University of Florida, FL, United States.
Adam T HirshDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Steven Z GeorgeDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Anne L HorgasCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
James W AtchisonRehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Calia A TorresDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Michael E RobinsonDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: merobin@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · USShirley Ryan AbilityLab · USUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

SEX VS GENDER IN PAIN PERCEPTIONR01DE013208 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI ROBINSON, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2011
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013208NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE013208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious literature indicates that biases exist in pain ratings. Healthcare professionals have been found to use patient demographic cues such as sex, race, and age when making decisions about pain treatment. However, there has been little research comparing healthcare professionals' (i.e., physicians and nurses) pain decision policies based on patient demographic cues.

methodsThe current study used virtual human technology to examine the impact of patients' sex, race, and age on healthcare professionals' pain ratings. One hundred and ninety-three healthcare professionals (nurses and physicians) participated in this online study.

resultsHealthcare professionals assessed virtual human patients who were male and African American to be experiencing greater pain intensity and were more willing to administer opioid analgesics to them than to their demographic counterparts. Similarly, nurses were more willing to administer opioids make treatment decisions than physicians. There was also a significant virtual human-sex by healthcare professional interaction for pain assessment and treatment decisions. The sex difference (male>female) was greater for nurses than physicians.

conclusionsResults replicated findings of previous studies using virtual human patients to assess the effect of sex, race, and age in pain decision-making. In addition, healthcare professionals' pain ratings differed depending on healthcare profession. Nurses were more likely to rate pain higher and be more willing to administer opioid analgesics than were physicians. Healthcare professionals rated male and African American virtual human patients as having higher pain in most pain assessment and treatment domains compared to their demographic counterparts. Similarly the virtual human-sex difference ratings were more pronounced for nurses than physicians. Given the large number of patients seen throughout the healthcare professionals' careers, these pain practice biases have important public health implications. This study suggests attention to the influence of patient demographic cues in pain management education is needed.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth PersonnelInternetPopulation GroupsSex FactorsAdultAgedData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementUser-Computer InterfaceYoung AdultHealthcare professionalsPain assessmentPain treatmentVirtual technology

Identifiers

PMID24128374
PMCPMC3969773
OpenAlexW1999425066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.