Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24128276›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2014

Intravascular immunity as a key to systemic vasculitis: a work in progress, gaining momentum.

G A Ramirez, N Maugeri, M G Sabbadini, P Rovere-Querini, A A Manfredi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Role of Alarmins in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Kawasaki disease: a matter of innate immunity.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G A RamirezIstituto Scientifico San Raffaele and Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
N Maugeri
M G Sabbadini
P Rovere-Querini
A A Manfredi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular inflammation contributes to the defence against invading microbes and to the repair of injured tissues. In most cases it resolves before becoming apparent. Vasculitis comprises heterogeneous clinical entities that are characterized by the persistence of vascular inflammation after it has served its homeostatic function. Most underlying mechanisms have so far remained elusive. Intravascular immunity refers to the surveillance of the vasculature by leucocytes that sense microbial or sterile threats to vessel integrity and initiate protective responses that entail most events that determine the clinical manifestations of vasculitis, such as end-organ ischaemia, neutrophil extracellular traps generation and thrombosis, leucocyte extravasation and degranulation. Understanding how the resolution of vascular inflammation goes awry in patients with systemic vasculitis will facilitate the identification of novel pharmacological targets and bring us a step closer in each patient to the selection of more effective and less toxic treatments.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBlood VesselsB-LymphocytesC-Reactive ProteinHumansInflammasomesPentraxinsSerum Amyloid P-ComponentSystemic VasculitisThrombosisT-LymphocytesC-Reactive ProteinInflammasomesPentraxinsSerum Amyloid P-Componentintravascular immunitypathogenesisthrombosistreatmentvasculitisvessel inflammation

Identifiers

PMID24128276
PMCPMC3892406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.