Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24128060›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2013

PT-Flax (phenotyping and TILLinG of flax): development of a flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) mutant population and TILLinG platform for forward and reverse genetics.

Maxime Chantreau, Sébastien Grec, Laurent Gutierrez, Marion Dalmais, Christophe Pineau, Hervé Demailly, Christine Paysant-Leroux, Reynald Tavernier, Jean-Paul Trouvé, Manash Chatterjee and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Induced Mutagenesis inFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Maxime Chantreau
Sébastien Grec
Laurent Gutierrez
Marion Dalmais
Christophe Pineau
Hervé Demailly
Christine Paysant-Leroux
Reynald Tavernier
Jean-Paul Trouvé
Manash Chatterjee
Xavier Guillot
Véronique Brunaud
Brigitte Chabbert
Olivier van Wuytswinkel
Abdelhafid Bendahmane
Brigitte Thomasset
Simon HawkinsUniversité Lille Nord de France, Lille 1 UMR 1281, Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex F-59650, France. simon.hawkins@univ-lille1.fr.
Centre des Matériaux · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FRBiologie des Plantes et Innovation · FRFractionnation of AgroResources and Environment · FROllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESoitec (France) · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité de Technologie de Compiègne · FRUniversité Pierre Mendès France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlax (Linum usitatissimum L.) is an economically important fiber and oil crop that has been grown for thousands of years. The genome has been recently sequenced and transcriptomics are providing information on candidate genes potentially related to agronomically-important traits. In order to accelerate functional characterization of these genes we have generated a flax EMS mutant population that can be used as a TILLinG (Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes) platform for forward and reverse genetics.

resultsA population of 4,894 M2 mutant seed families was generated using 3 different EMS concentrations (0.3%, 0.6% and 0.75%) and used to produce M2 plants for subsequent phenotyping and DNA extraction. 10,839 viable M2 plants (4,033 families) were obtained and 1,552 families (38.5%) showed a visual developmental phenotype (stem size and diameter, plant architecture, flower-related). The majority of these families showed more than one phenotype. Mutant phenotype data are organised in a database and can be accessed and searched at UTILLdb (http://urgv.evry.inra.fr/UTILLdb). Preliminary screens were also performed for atypical fiber and seed phenotypes. Genomic DNA was extracted from 3,515 M2 families and eight-fold pooled for subsequent mutant detection by ENDO1 nuclease mis-match cleavage. In order to validate the collection for reverse genetics, DNA pools were screened for two genes coding enzymes of the lignin biosynthesis pathway: Coumarate-3-Hydroxylase (C3H) and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase (CAD). We identified 79 and 76 mutations in the C3H and CAD genes, respectively. The average mutation rate was calculated as 1/41 Kb giving rise to approximately 9,000 mutations per genome. Thirty-five out of the 52 flax cad mutant families containing missense or codon stop mutations showed the typical orange-brown xylem phenotype observed in CAD down-regulated/mutant plants in other species.

conclusionsWe have developed a flax mutant population that can be used as an efficient forward and reverse genetics tool. The collection has an extremely high mutation rate that enables the detection of large numbers of independant mutant families by screening a comparatively low number of M2 families. The population will prove to be a valuable resource for both fundamental research and the identification of agronomically-important genes for crop improvement in flax.

Indexed as

Base PairingEthyl MethanesulfonateFlaxFlowersGenes, PlantGenome, PlantGenotypeLigninMutagenesisMutationMutation RateNucleotide MotifsPhenotypePhylogenyReverse GeneticsSeedsEthyl MethanesulfonateLignin

Identifiers

PMID24128060
PMCPMC3853753
OpenAlexW2169030900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.