ArticleClinical and translational science2013
Assessing research interest and capacity in community health centers.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling the potential increase in eligible participants in clinical trials with inclusion of community intensive care unit patients in Alberta, Canada: a decision tree analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Trial
- Bridging the Gap: Recommendations for Sustainable Research Partnerships Between Community Health and Academic Health Centers.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2026Article
- Research Infrastructure and Capacity in Federally Qualified Health Centers.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2025Article
- Assessing a community health center-driven process for engaging with translational scientists: What will it take?Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Recruiting Community Health Centers for Implementation Research: Challenges, Implications, and Potential Solutions.Health equity · 2024Article
- The GROWBABY Research Network: A Framework for Advancing Health Equity Through Community Engaged Practice-Based Research.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Article
- Building research capacity at FQHCs: A model of support from theJournal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Fostering community hospital research.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2019Article
- Lessons Learned from Three Models that Use Small Grants for Building Academic-Community Partnerships for Research.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2016Article
- Federally Qualified Health Centers' Capacity and Readiness for Research Collaborations: Implications for Clinical-Academic-Community Partnerships.Clinical and translational science · 2015Article
- Provider's perspectives on building research and quality improvement capacity in primary care: a strategy to improve workforce satisfaction.Clinical and translational science · 2013Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCommunity health centers (CHCs) have great potential to participate in the development of evidence-based primary care but face obstacles to engagement in clinical translational research.
methodsTo understand factors associated with CHC interest in building research infrastructure, Harvard Catalyst and the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers conducted an online survey of medical directors in all 50 Massachusetts CHC networks.
resultsThirty-two (64%) medical directors completed the survey representing 126 clinical sites. Over 80% reported that their primary care providers (PCPs) were slightly to very interested in future clinical research and that they were interested in building research infrastructure at their CHC. Frequently cited barriers to participation in research included financial issues, lack of research skills, and lack of research infrastructure. In bivariate analyses, PCP interest in future clinical research and a belief that involvement in research contributed to PCP retention were significantly associated with interest in building research infrastructure.
conclusionCHCs critical role in caring for vulnerable populations ideally positions them to raise relevant research questions and translate evidence into practice. Our findings suggest a high interest in engagement in research among CHC leadership. CTSAs have a unique opportunity to support local CHCs in this endeavor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.