ArticleAnalytical chemistry2013
On-chip evaluation of neutrophil activation and neutrophil-endothelial cell interaction during neutrophil chemotaxis.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging biomodels to understand the pathophysiology of sepsis and evaluate new therapeutic strategies targeting extracellular histones.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Vasculature-on-a-chip technologies as platforms for advanced studies of bacterial infections.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- Review
- Simplified Cell Magnetic Isolation Assisted SCMicromachines · 2022Article
- Centriole and Golgi microtubule nucleation are dispensable for the migration of human neutrophil-like cells.Molecular biology of the cell · 2021Article
- Oncoimmunology Meets Organs-on-Chip.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- A novel computer vision-based assessment of neutrophil chemotaxis in patients with severe infection.Clinical & translational immunology · 2021Article
- Microfluidic devices for neutrophil chemotaxis studies.Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Neutrophil-Derived Microvesicle Induced Dysfunction of Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Tissue engineered bone mimetics to study bone disorders ex vivo: Role of bioinspired materials.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- An Accessible Organotypic Microvessel Model Using iPSC-Derived Endothelium.Advanced healthcare materials · 2018Article
- Microfluidic assay for precise measurements of mouse, rat, and human neutrophil chemotaxis in whole-blood droplets.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2016Article
- Electronic cigarette exposure triggers neutrophil inflammatory responses.Respiratory research · 2016Article
- Microfluidic device for simultaneous analysis of neutrophil extracellular traps and production of reactive oxygen species.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016Article
- Gradient generation platforms: new directions for an established microfluidic technology.Lab on a chip · 2014Article
- Microfluidics-based in vivo mimetic systems for the study of cellular biology.Accounts of chemical research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neutrophils are always surrounded by/interacting with other components of the immune system; however, the current mechanistic understanding of neutrophil function is largely based on how neutrophils respond to a single chemical signal in a simplified environment. Such approaches are unable to recapitulate the in vivo microenvironment; thus, cell behavior may not fully represent the physiological behavior. Herein, we exploit a microfluidic model of the complex in vivo milieu to investigate how cell-cell interactions influence human neutrophil migration and surface marker expression. Neutrophil migration against a bacterially derived chemoattractant (formyl-met-leu-phe, fMLP), with and without preactivation by interleukins (interleukin-2 or interleukin-6), was evaluated in the presence and absence of endothelial support cells. Preactivation by interleukins or interaction with endothelial cells resulted in altered migration rates compared to naïve neutrophils, and migration trajectories deviated from the expected movement toward the fMLP signal. Interestingly, interaction with both interleukins and endothelial cells simultaneously resulted in a slight compensation in the deviation-on endothelial cells, 34.4% of untreated neutrophils moved away from the fMLP signal, while only 15.2 or 22.2% (interleukin-2-or interleukin-6-activated) of preactivated cells moved away from fMLP. Neutrophils interacting with interleukins and/or endothelial cells were still capable of prioritizing the fMLP signal over a competing chemoattractant, leukotriene B4 (LTB4). Fluorescence imaging of individual human neutrophils revealed that neutrophils treated with endothelial-cell-conditioned media showed up-regulation of the surface adhesion molecules cluster determinant 11b and 66b (CD11b and CD66b) upon stimulation. On the other hand, CD11b and CD66b down-regulation was observed in untreated neutrophils. These results leverage single cell analysis to reveal that the interaction between neutrophils and endothelial cells is involved in surface marker regulation and thus chemotaxis of neutrophils. This study brings new knowledge about neutrophil chemotaxis in the context of cell-to-cell communications, yielding both fundamental and therapeutically relevant insight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.