Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24127700›Full record

SynthesisAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2013

Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.

Sofie Rahman Morgan, Anna Marie Chang, Mahfood Alqatari, Jesse M Pines

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03235830 (Evaluation of Text Messaging as an Educational Method to Improve Healthcare Utilization), which is not on this map. Cited by 75 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03235830 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Text Messaging as an Educational Method to Improve Healthcare Utilization

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Louis UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled231ConditionsText MessagingArmsEnhanced Standard of Care (ESoC) + Text, Enhanced Standard of Care (ESoC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Identifying drivers of emergency department overutilization following bariatric surgery: insights from the MBSAQIP.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofie Rahman MorganDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Anna Marie Chang
Mahfood Alqatari
Jesse M Pines

Funding

Oregon Multidisciplinary Training Program in Emergency Medicine Clinical ResearchK12HL108974 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NEWGARD, CRAIG D. · 2011 to 2015
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1K12HL108974-01NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL108974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecent health policy changes have focused efforts on reducing emergency department (ED) visits as a way to reduce costs and improve quality of care. This was a systematic review of interventions based outside the ED aimed at reducing ED use.

methodsThis study was designed as a systematic review. We reviewed the literature on interventions in five categories: patient education, creation of additional non-ED capacity, managed care, prehospital diversion, and patient financial incentives. Studies written in English, with interventions administered outside of the ED, and a comparison group where ED use was an outcome, were included. Two independent reviewers screened search results using MEDLINE, Cochrane, OAIster, or Scopus. The following data were abstracted from included studies: type of intervention, study design, population, details of intervention, effect on ED use, effect on non-ED health care use, and other health and financial outcomes. Quality of individual articles was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.

resultsOf 39 included studies, 34 were observational and five were randomized controlled trials. Two of five studies on patient education found reductions in ED use ranging from 21% to 80%. Out of 10 studies of additional non-ED capacity, four showed decreases of 9% to 54%, and one a 21% increase. Both studies on prehospital diversion found reductions of 3% to 7%. Of 12 studies on managed care, 10 had decreases ranging from 1% to 46%. Nine out of 10 studies on patient financial incentives found decreases of 3% to 50%, and one a 34% increase. Nineteen studies reported effect on non-ED use with mixed results. Seventeen studies included data on health outcomes, but 13 of these only included data on hospitalizations rather than morbidity and mortality. Seven studies included data on cost outcomes. According to the GRADE guidelines, all studies had at least some risk of bias, with four moderate quality, one low quality, and 34 very low quality studies.

conclusionsMany studies have explored interventions based outside the ED to reduce ED use in various populations, with mixed evidence. Approximately two-thirds identified here showed reductions in ED use. The interventions with the greatest number of studies showing reductions in ED use include patient financial incentives and managed care, while the greatest magnitude of reductions were found in patient education. These findings have implications for insurers and policymakers seeking to reduce ED use.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth Services MisuseHospitalizationHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID24127700
PMCPMC4038086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.