ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2013
The use of elements as a substitute for biomass in toxicokinetic studies in small organisms.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining pollutant concentrations in the tissues of experimental test organisms is necessary for understanding uptake and excretion mechanisms of toxicants. Using small organisms can make the determination of organism biomass inaccurate. We here propose the use of selected tissue element contents as a proxy for tissue biomass. Forty different elements were determined in tissues of the two worm species Enchytraeus crypticus and Caenorhabditis elegans derived from cultures exposed to combinations of varying temperatures and sublethal concentrations of Cu and Cd. Three criteria were used to select good biomass indicators: The element concentration must (1) be present in concentrations above the limit of quantification of the analytical method, (2) must be stable and (3) must not be affected by the treatment. If the organisms are believed to have significant amounts of soil in their gut, the element must also be present at higher concentrations in the tissue compared to the soil. The three elements K, Mg and P all lived up to the first three criteria for both worm species, showing correlation coefficients between element content and tissue biomass of 0.97, 0.96 and 0.97 (n = 25) and 0.997, 0.998 and 0.992 (n = 10) for K, Mg and P in the E. crypticus and C. elegans, respectively. Only P would be an appropriate biomass indicator for organisms with a soil gut uptake assuming the tissue concentrations in soil eating organisms are similar to those measured in the present study. Using Mg as a biomass indicator on a verification dataset of Cu and Cd uptake in E. crypticus, compared to giving Cu and Cd content per individual organism, decreased the coefficient of variation from 31 ± 21 to 21 ± 17 % and from 34 ± 22 to 9.3 ± 6.4 % for tissue Cu and Cd, respectively. We therefore conclude that the use of an element as a biomass indicator can reduce tissue concentration variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.