Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24126803›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2013

A panel of four immunohistochemical markers (CK7, CK20, TTF-1, and p63) allows accurate diagnosis of primary and metastatic lung carcinoma on biopsy specimens.

Diana Montezuma, Rosa Azevedo, Paula Lopes, Renata Vieira, Ana Luísa Cunha, Rui Henrique

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Use of Diagnostic Tests in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana MontezumaDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Rosa Azevedo
Paula Lopes
Renata Vieira
Ana Luísa Cunha
Rui Henrique
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of lung cancer, as well as the differentiation between primary and metastatic carcinoma to the lung, mostly performed on biopsy or fine needle aspiration specimens, is critical for decisions on therapy and for determining prognosis. The limited amount of biopsy material available for morphological assessment has stimulated attempts to improve diagnostic accuracy through the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC), but an optimal IHC diagnostic algorithm has not been firmly established. We evaluated, on a retrospective series of biopsy specimens, the performance of a four-antibody IHC panel for accurate subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and for identification of metastatic carcinoma. Tumor morphology was assessed and IHC for CK7, CK20, TTF-1, and p63 was performed according to a two-step algorithm. Matched resection specimens served as gold standard and were compared with the corresponding biopsy. Of 443 biopsy specimens studied, 325 were diagnosed as primary carcinoma of the lung, 198 (44.7 %) as adenocarcinoma, 9 (2 %) as possibly adenosquamous carcinoma, 127 (28.7 %) as squamous cell carcinoma, and 40 (9 %) as NSCLC not further classifiable. Ten cases (2.3 %) were classified as adenocarcinoma of unknown origin and 58 (13 %) as metastasis. Importantly, of the primary lung adenocarcinomas, 35 (17.7 %) had been considered on clinical grounds as a metastasis from a previously diagnosed primary tumor. Of the 55 cases submitted to surgical resection in 47 (85.5 %) the biopsy diagnosis was confirmed, revealing substantial agreement (κ value = 0.757). Our two-step approach allows for accurate subclassification of NSCLC and also to distinguish between primary lung adenocarcinoma and metastasis, notably of colorectal adenocarcinoma, with crucial implications for appropriate patient management.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinomaDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratin-20Keratin-7Lung NeoplasmsMembrane ProteinsNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTranscription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorCKAP4 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsKeratin-20Keratin-7Membrane ProteinsTranscription FactorsTTF1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24126803
OpenAlexW2111689189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.