Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24126585›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Reevaluation of ceftazidime dosing recommendations in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Katie E Cardone, Darren W Grabe, Evan J Zasowski, Thomas P Lodise

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04367974 (Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study of Ceftazidime and Cefazolin in Treating CAPD-related Peritonitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04367974 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study of Ceftazidime and Cefazolin in Treating CAPD-related Peritonitis

TypeobservationalSponsorFifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsCAPD-related Peritonitis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis · 2016
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie E CardoneAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA.
Darren W Grabe
Evan J Zasowski
Thomas P Lodise
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While intraperitoneal (i.p.) ceftazidime is commonly used to treat continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)-related infections, the ability of i.p. regimens to achieve critical pharmacodynamic targets in both blood and dialysate has not been reported. To understand the pharmacodynamic profile of ceftazidime during CAPD, data were obtained from a single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) i.p. ceftazidime study that included 10 CAPD patients who received i.p. ceftazidime at 15 mg/kg of body weight. The probability of target attainment (concentrations maintained above the MIC for >60% of the dosing interval [60% T > MIC]) was determined for six simulated regimens. A 3-compartment model with each dialysis dwell modeled as a separate differential equation was fit to ceftazidime concentrations using BigNPAG. Embedded with the final PK model, serum and dialysate concentration-time profiles of ceftazidime at 1, 1.5, and 2 g i.p. every 24 h (q24h) to q48h were simulated using ADAPT 5. The mean population pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: apparent volume of the central compartment (Vc), 7.57 liter; apparent volume of the peritoneal cavity (Vpd), 2.44 liter; clearance from the central compartment (CL), 0.379 liter/h; intercompartmental transfer rate constants (first order) between the central and peripheral compartments (k12 and k21), 4.66 and 4.88 h(-1), respectively; and intercompartmental transfer rate constants (first order) between the central and peritoneal compartments (k13 and k31), 0.111 and 0.227 h(-1), respectively. In serum, the probability of target attainment for MICs of ≤8 mg/liter exceeded 90% for 1.5 to 2 g i.p. q24h to q48h. However, no tested regimen provided adequate dialysate exposure at MICs of ≥8 mg/liter on day 1 without the use of a 3-g loading dose (post hoc analysis). On day 2, 1.5 to 2 g i.p. q24h or 2 g i.p. q48h provided adequate exposure in the peritoneal cavity. These results should be validated in the presence of infection. Ceftazidime i.p. at 1.5 or 2 g q24h to q48h is recommended for nonperitoneal infections. For peritonitis, a 3-g load with maintenance dosing of 1 to 2 g i.p. q24h or 2 g i.p. q48h is recommended.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftazidimeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryPeritonitisProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftazidime

Identifiers

PMID24126585
PMCPMC3910753
OpenAlexW2041595475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.