The new UEMS-EACCME criteria for accreditation of live educational events (LEEs): another step forward to improve the quality of continuing medical education (CME) in Europe.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Predictors of health professionals' satisfaction with continuing education: A cross-sectional study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020
   Article
2. Ideas from the second UEMS conference on CME/CPD: new EU directives on a patients' rights in cross-border healthcare and professional qualifications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014
   Article
3. The new UEMS-EACCME criteria for accreditation of live educational events (LEEs): another step forward to improve the quality of continuing medical education (CME) in Europe.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as