Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24126238›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2014

The validity and utility of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory in patients with prostate cancer: evidence from the Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns (SOAPP) data from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Desiree Jones, Fengmin Zhao, Michael J Fisch, Lynne I Wagner, Linda J Patrick-Miller, Charles S Cleeland, Tito R Mendoza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The level of association between functional performance status measures and patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Docetaxel-related fatigue in men with metastatic prostate cancer: a descriptive analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Trial
  5. Patient-reported quality-of-life analysis of radium-223 dichloride from the phase III ALSYMPCA study.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Understanding Treatment Tolerability in Older Adults With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Longitudinal assessment of the impact of higher body mass index on cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. What symptoms are important to patients? Developing a symptom burden measure for women with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Modification of existing patient-reported outcome measures: qualitative development of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MDASI-MPM).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Review
  20. Utility of a patient-reported outcome in measuring functional impairment during autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Desiree JonesDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: Djones1@mdanderson.org.
Fengmin ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Michael J FischDepartment of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Lynne I WagnerDepartments of Medical Social Sciences and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Linda J Patrick-MillerDepartment of Medicine and Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Charles S CleelandDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Tito R MendozaDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Foreign Accrual - ECOGU10CA037403 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI COMIS, ROBERT L · 1985 to 2014
$34.6M
Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
Reducing the Symptom Burden Produced by Aggressive Cancer TherapiesR01CA026582 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI CLEELAND, CHARLES S · 1986 to 2013
$7.3M
ECOG Clinical TrialsU10CA017145 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSON, AL B · 1985 to 2013
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA026582NCI NIH HHS U10 CA017145NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037403NCI NIH HHS U10 CA17145NCI NIH HHS U10CA37403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a psychometrically validated patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the severity and impact of multiple symptoms related to cancer and its treatment and has the potential to guide treatment specific to patients with prostate cancer. Although the original MDASI validation study encompassed various cancer types, the instrument's psychometric properties have not been examined in a large homogeneous sample of patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study involved secondary analysis of data from the nationwide multicenter Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) SOAPP (Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns) study, which enrolled patients from 38 ECOG-affiliated institutions, including 6 academic centers and 32 community clinics. Data were used to establish the psychometric properties of the MDASI in a subsample of 320 patients with prostate cancer. The instrument was administered twice, approximately 1 month apart.

resultsThe MDASI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability (with Cronbach alphas of ≥ .84 and intraclass correlations of ≥ 0.76 for all subscales), strong ability to discriminate between clinically different patient groups (by performance status, tumor response, and disease stage), and high sensitivity in detecting symptom change (with respect to patient-reported quality of life [QOL] between the baseline and 1-month follow-up visits).

conclusionThe MDASI is a valid, reliable, and sensitive symptom-assessment instrument that can be used with confidence in descriptive and clinical studies of symptom status in patients with prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prostatic NeoplasmsPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeECOGMDASIPatient-reported outcomeSymptom assessmentValidation

Identifiers

PMID24126238
PMCPMC3948205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.