Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24126218›Full record

ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2013

Mephedrone interactions with cocaine: prior exposure to the 'bath salt' constituent enhances cocaine-induced locomotor activation in rats.

Ryan A Gregg, Christopher S Tallarida, Allen B Reitz, Scott M Rawls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan A GreggaCenter for Substance Abuse Research bDepartment of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia cFox Chase Chemical Diversity Center, Doylestown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Christopher S Tallarida
Allen B Reitz
Scott M Rawls
Temple University · USFox Chase Chemical Diversity Center · US

Funding

Pilot Projects Core (PPC)P30DA013429 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Anjali M Rajadhyaksha · 2000 to 2026
$34.6M
Mephedrone and addiction: clues from animal modelsR21DA032718 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI RAWLS, SCOTT M. · 2012 to 2013
$337k
Can beta-lactam antibiotics decrease morphine physical dependence?R15DA025314 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI RAWLS, SCOTT M. · 2008 to 2008
$225k
NIDA NIH HHS DA01342NIDA NIH HHS DA025314NIDA NIH HHS DA032718NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA013429NIDA NIH HHS R15 DA025314NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA032718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concurrent use of mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone; MEPH) and established drugs of abuse is now commonplace, but knowledge about interactions between these drugs is sparse. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that prior MEPH exposure enhances the locomotor-stimulant effects of cocaine and methamphetamine (METH). For cocaine experiments, rats pretreated with saline, cocaine (15 mg/kg), or MEPH (15 mg/kg) for 5 days were injected with cocaine after 10 days of drug absence. For METH experiments, rats pretreated with saline, METH (2 mg/kg), or MEPH (15 mg/kg) were injected with METH after 10 days of drug absence. Cocaine challenge produced greater locomotor activity after pretreatment with cocaine or MEPH than after pretreatment with saline. METH challenge produced greater locomotor activity after METH pretreatment than after saline pretreatment; however, locomotor activity in rats pretreated with MEPH or saline and then challenged with METH was not significantly different. The locomotor response to MEPH (15 mg/kg) was not significantly affected by pretreatment with cocaine (15 mg/kg) or METH (0.5, 2 mg/kg). The present demonstration that cocaine-induced locomotor activation is enhanced by prior MEPH exposure suggests that MEPH cross-sensitizes to cocaine and increases cocaine efficacy. Interestingly, MEPH cross-sensitization was not bidirectional and did not extend to METH, suggesting that the phenomenon is sensitive to specific psychostimulants.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDrug SynergismMaleMethamphetamineMotor ActivityRatsCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocainemephedroneMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID24126218
PMCPMC4293121
OpenAlexW1970595219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.