Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24126078›Full record

ArticleChannels (Austin, Tex.)2014

Gating charge movement precedes ionic current activation in hERG channels.

Samuel J Goodchild, David Fedida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Channels (Austin, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Determinants of Voltage-Dependent Gating in Kv11.1 Channels.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The ERG1 KFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  5. The EAG Voltage-Dependent KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  6. Modulation of hERG KFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. S4-S5 linker movement during activation and inactivation in voltage-gated KProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Gating mechanism of Kv11.1 (hERG) KPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Samuel J GoodchildDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC Canada.
David FedidaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC Canada.
Therapeutics Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently reported gating currents recorded from hERG channels expressed in mammalian TSA cells and assessed the kinetics at different voltages. We detected 2 distinct components of charge movement with the bulk of the charge being carried by a slower component. Here we compare our findings in TSA cells with recordings made from oocytes using the Cut Open Vaseline Gap clamp (COVG) and go on to directly compare activation of gating charge and ionic currents at 0 and +60 mV. The data show that gating charge saturates and moves more rapidly than ionic current activates suggesting a transition downstream from the movement of the bulk of gating charge is rate limiting for channel opening.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingCells, CulturedEther-A-Go-Go Potassium ChannelsHumansOocytesPatch-Clamp TechniquesEther-A-Go-Go Potassium Channelsactivationgating currentshERGkineticspotassium channel

Identifiers

PMID24126078
PMCPMC4048346
OpenAlexW1978244150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.