Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24126015›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2014

Comparative in vitro and in vivo assessment of toxin neutralization by anti-tetanus toxin monoclonal antibodies.

Mehdi Yousefi, Roya Khosravi-Eghbal, Ahmad Reza Mahmoudi, Mahmood Jeddi-Tehrani, Hodjatallah Rabbani, Fazel Shokri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Is the vaccination-induced B cell receptor repertoire predictable?Immunoinformatics (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in optical molecular imaging for neural visualization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  7. Therapeutic effect of CT-P59 against SARS-CoV-2 South African variant.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehdi YousefiDepartment of Immunology; School of Public Health; Tehran University of Medical Sciences; Tehran, Iran; Immunology Research Center; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; Tabriz, Iran; Department of Immunology; School of Medicine; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; Tabriz, Iran.
Roya Khosravi-EghbalMonoclonal Antibody Research Center; Avicenna Research Institute; ACECR; Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Reza MahmoudiMonoclonal Antibody Research Center; Avicenna Research Institute; ACECR; Tehran, Iran.
Mahmood Jeddi-TehraniMonoclonal Antibody Research Center; Avicenna Research Institute; ACECR; Tehran, Iran.
Hodjatallah RabbaniMonoclonal Antibody Research Center; Avicenna Research Institute; ACECR; Tehran, Iran.
Fazel ShokriDepartment of Immunology; School of Public Health; Tehran University of Medical Sciences; Tehran, Iran; Monoclonal Antibody Research Center; Avicenna Research Institute; ACECR; Tehran, Iran.
Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tetanus is caused by the tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT), a 150 kDa single polypeptide molecule which is cleaved into an active two-chain molecule composed of a 50 kDa N-terminal light (L) and a 100 kDa C-terminal heavy (H) chains. Recently, extensive effort has focused on characterization of TeNT binding receptors and toxin neutralization by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Toxin binding inhibition and neutralization is routinely assessed either in vitro by the ganglioside GT1b binding inhibition assay or in vivo using an animal model. These two assay systems have never been compared. In the present study, we report characterization of eleven mAbs against different parts of TeNT. The toxin inhibitory and neutralization activity of the mAbs was assessed in vitro and in vivo respectively. Our data demonstrated that seven mAbs bind to fragment C of the heavy chain, two mAbs react with the light chain, one mAb recognizes both chains and one mAb reacts with neither light chain nor fragment C. Six fragment C specific mAbs were able to inhibit TeNT binding to GT1b ganglioside in vitro but three failed to neutralize the toxin in vivo. One in vitro inhibitory mAb (1F3E3) was found to synergize with the in vivo neutralizing mAbs to reduce toxin lethal activity in vivo. Sequencing of the immunoglobulin heavy and light chain variable region genes revealed that the three in vivo neutralizing mAbs were derived from a common origin. Altogether, our data suggests that fragment C specific mAbs contribute to toxin neutralization in both systems, though some of the GT1b binding inhibitory mAbs may not be able to neutralize TeNT in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingBotulismGangliosidesMaleMice, Inbred BALB CNeutralization TestsProtein BindingSurvival AnalysisTetanus ToxinAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingGangliosidesTetanus Toxintrisialoganglioside GT1GT1b binding assayin vivo neutralization assayneutralizing mAbstetanus neurotoxin

Identifiers

PMID24126015
PMCPMC4185888
OpenAlexW2069844237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.