Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24124728›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2013

Antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from stool samples of children aged 3 to 14 years from Ujjain, India.

Pragya Shakya, Peter Barrett, Vishal Diwan, Yogyata Marothi, Harshada Shah, Neeraj Chhari, Ashok J Tamhankar, Ashish Pathak, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Resistance Patterns inTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. GC-MS Analysis, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Potential of Ethyl Acetate Leaf Extract ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Fluoroquinolone-ResistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Distribution of Antibiotic-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pragya ShakyaGlobal Health (IHCAR), Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. vishaldiwan@hotmail.com.
Peter Barrett
Vishal Diwan
Yogyata Marothi
Harshada Shah
Neeraj Chhari
Ashok J Tamhankar
Ashish Pathak
Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College · INKarolinska Institutet · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance is a major global public health concern, particularly in settings where few treatment options are available. Limited research has been done on antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli of Indian children at community level. Therefore we studied antibiotic resistance patterns in E. coli isolates from stool samples of children aged 3-14 years from Ujjain, Central India, to investigate associations of resistance with demographic variables.

methodsChildren, 3-14 years of age, were included from 30 randomly selected villages of Palwa demographic surveillance site, Ujjain, India. Parents were interviewed using a questionnaire, and stool samples were collected from participating children. E. coli were isolated from stool samples (n = 529), and susceptibility testing to 18 different antibiotics was done using standard methods.

resultsThe proportions of isolates resistant to various antibiotics were, nalidixic acid, (45%), tetracycline (37%), ampicillin (37%), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (29%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (29%). No isolates were resistant to imipenem. Overall, 72% of isolates were resistant to at least one antibiotic and 33% were multi-drug resistant. High rates of cross-resistance were seen for 15 (83%) of the antibiotics studied. E. coli isolates from children with literate mothers were more resistant to penicillins and fluoroquinolones. ESBL-producers comprised 9% of the isolates.

conclusionAntibiotic resistance and cross-resistance were common in E. coli from stools of children. Resistance rates were associated with maternal literacy.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliFecesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24124728
PMCPMC3853101
OpenAlexW2110123140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.