Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24124521›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Distinct effects of EGFR ligands on human mammary epithelial cell differentiation.

Chandrani Mukhopadhyay, Xiangshan Zhao, Dulce Maroni, Vimla Band, Mayumi Naramura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification and functional analysis of mFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Casitas B-cell lymphoma (Cbl) proteins protect mammary epithelial cells from proteotoxicity of active c-Src accumulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chandrani MukhopadhyayEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Xiangshan Zhao
Dulce Maroni
Vimla Band
Mayumi Naramura

Funding

A novel regulator of p53 functionR01CA096844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, VIMLA · 2002 to 2011
$2.7M
Ecd as a regulator of cell cycle and breast oncogenesisR01CA144027 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, VIMLA · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA144027NCI NIH HHS CA96844NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096844NCI NIH HHS R01 CA144027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on gene expression patterns, breast cancers can be divided into subtypes that closely resemble various developmental stages of normal mammary epithelial cells (MECs). Thus, understanding molecular mechanisms of MEC development is expected to provide critical insights into initiation and progression of breast cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its ligands play essential roles in normal and pathological mammary gland. Signals through EGFR is required for normal mammary gland development. Ligands for EGFR are over-expressed in a significant proportion of breast cancers, and elevated expression of EGFR is associated with poorer clinical outcome. In the present study, we examined the effect of signals through EGFR on MEC differentiation using the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)-immortalized human stem/progenitor MECs which express cytokeratin 5 but lack cytokeratin 19 (K5(+)K19(-) hMECs). As reported previously, these cells can be induced to differentiate into luminal and myoepithelial cells under appropriate culture conditions. K5(+)K19(-) hMECs acquired distinct cell fates in response to EGFR ligands epidermal growth factor (EGF), amphiregulin (AREG) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα) in differentiation-promoting MEGM medium. Specifically, presence of EGF during in vitro differentiation supported development into both luminal and myoepithelial lineages, whereas cells differentiated only towards luminal lineage when EGF was replaced with AREG. In contrast, substitution with TGFα led to differentiation only into myoepithelial lineage. Chemical inhibition of the MEK-Erk pathway, but not the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT pathway, interfered with K5(+)K19(-) hMEC differentiation. The present data validate the utility of the K5(+)K19(-) hMEC cells for modeling key features of human MEC differentiation. This system should be useful in studying molecular/biochemical mechanisms of human MEC differentiation.

Indexed as

AmphiregulinCell DifferentiationCell LineEGF Family of ProteinsEpidermal Growth FactorEpithelial CellsErbB ReceptorsFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGlycoproteinsHumansImmunoblottingIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMammary Glands, HumanMicroscopy, ConfocalTransforming Growth Factor alphaAmphiregulinAREG protein, humanEGF Family of ProteinsEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsGlycoproteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor alpha

Identifiers

PMID24124521
PMCPMC3790811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.