Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24124015›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology journal2013

The centrality of RNA for engineering gene expression.

James Chappell, Melissa K Takahashi, Sarai Meyer, David Loughrey, Kyle E Watters, Julius Lucks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Predicting RNA Scaffolds with a Hybrid Method of Vfold3D and VfoldLA.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Applying a New REFINE Approach inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. High-throughput determination of RNA structures.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James ChappellSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Melissa K Takahashi
Sarai Meyer
David Loughrey
Kyle E Watters
Julius Lucks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology holds promise as both a framework for rationally engineering biological systems and a way to revolutionize how we fundamentally understand them. Essential to realizing this promise is the development of strategies and tools to reliably and predictably control and characterize sophisticated patterns of gene expression. Here we review the role that RNA can play towards this goal and make a case for why this versatile, designable, and increasingly characterizable molecule is one of the most powerful substrates for engineering gene expression at our disposal. We discuss current natural and synthetic RNA regulators of gene expression acting at key points of control--transcription, mRNA degradation, and translation. We also consider RNA structural probing and computational RNA structure predication tools as a way to study RNA structure and ultimately function. Finally, we discuss how next-generation sequencing methods are being applied to the study of RNA and to the characterization of RNA's many properties throughout the cell.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationRNASynthetic BiologyRiboswitchRiboswitchRNAGene regulationNext-generation sequencingNon-coding RNARNA structureSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID24124015
PMCPMC4033574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.