SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Thymectomy for non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thymectomy in nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis - systematic review and meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Pooled it
- Thymectomy is a beneficial therapy for patients with non-thymomatous ocular myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017Pooled it
- Ephedrine for myasthenia gravis, neonatal myasthenia and the congenital myasthenic syndromes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Thymectomy for non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Long-term effect of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: 2-year extension of the MGTX randomised trial.The Lancet. Neurology · 2019Trial
- Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis.The New England journal of medicine · 2016Trial
- Economic Evaluation of Thymectomy for the Treatment of Nonthymomatous Myasthenia Gravis.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Minimally invasiveJournal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Surgical innovation, statistical analysis, and professional culture: thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, 1936-2016.Medical history · 2025Article
- Ergonomic Assessment of Robotic versus Thoracoscopic Thymectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical spectrum of myasthenia gravis: An institute experience over 8 years from North East India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Neonatal Fc Receptor-Targeted Therapies in Neurology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- Article
- Effect of thymectomy in elderly patients with non-thymomatous generalized myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis.Neurologic clinics · 2018Review
- Clinical outcome of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis patients: A report from Iran.Iranian journal of neurology · 2018Article
- A patient with weakness and an abnormal chest radiograph: A case report.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2018Article
- Improved outcomes with surgeryAnnals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- A crucial first randomized controlled trial of thymectomy in non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Clinical features, pathogenesis, and treatment of myasthenia gravis: a supplement to the Guidelines of the German Neurological Society.Journal of neurology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatments currently used for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) include steroids, non-steroid immune suppressive agents, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and thymectomy. Data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) support the use of some of these therapeutic modalities and the evidence for non-surgical therapies are the subject of other Cochrane reviews. Significant uncertainty and variation persist in clinical practice regarding the potential role of thymectomy in the treatment of people with MG.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of thymectomy in the management of people with non-thymomatous MG. SEARCH
methodsOn 31 March 2013, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (2013, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2013) and LILACS (January 1992 to March 2013) for RCTs. Two authors (RS and GC) read all retrieved abstracts and reviewed the full texts of potentially relevant articles. These two authors checked references of all manuscripts identified in the review to identify additional articles that were of relevance and contacted experts in the field to identify additional published and unpublished data. Where necessary, authors were contacted for further information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of thymectomy against no treatment or any medical treatment, and thymectomy plus medical treatment against medical treatment alone, in people with non-thymomatous MG.We did not use measured outcomes as criteria for study selection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned that two authors would independently extract data onto a specially designed data extraction form and assess risk of bias; however, there were no included studies in the review. We would have identified any adverse effects of thymectomy from the included trials. MAIN
resultsWe did not identify any RCTs testing the efficacy of thymectomy in the treatment of MG. In the absence of data from RCTs, we were unable to do any further analysis. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no randomized controlled trial literature that allows meaningful conclusions about the efficacy of thymectomy on MG. Data from several class III observational studies suggest that thymectomy could be beneficial in MG. An RCT is needed to elucidate if thymectomy is useful, and to what extent, in MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.